Finding 963339 (2023-004)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-28
Audit: 299209
Organization: Pittsfield Housing Authority (RI)
Auditor: Marcum LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Authority failed to follow its procurement policy, missing competitive bidding requirements for contracts over set thresholds.
  • Impacted Requirements: Contracts exceeding $20,000 for construction and $25,000 for goods/services must solicit at least three quotes; this was not adhered to in five instances.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Enhance monitoring of contracts and regularly review cumulative payments to frequently used vendors to ensure compliance with procurement policies.

Finding Text

2023-004 – PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT Material Weakness/Material Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ALN #: 14.850 – Public and Indian Housing CRITERIA Any contract not exceeding $20,000 for construction or public improvements and $25,000 for goods or services may be made in accordance with the small purchase procedures. Contract requirements shall not be artificially divided so as to constitute a small purchase. For small purchases over $2,000, but not greater than $20,000 for construction or public improvements and $25,000 for goods or services no less than three offerors shall be solicited to submit price quotations. (Pittsfield Housing Authority Procurement Policy) CONDITION We examined a sample of 5 vendors used for goods and services during fiscal year 2023 and identified 5 instances where the Authority did not follow their procurement policy or did not retain sufficient supporting documentation. 2023-004 – PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT (CONTINUED) CAUSE The Authority’s internal control over procurement was not effective at identifying the need for competitive procurement in instances where frequently recurring transactions resulted in aggregate purchase in excess of competitive procurement thresholds. EFFECT The Authority has not ensured that it is receiving the most competitive prices or rates for services that have been procured, which may have resulted in unnecessary additional costs to the Authority. QUESTIONED COSTS Estimated questioned costs of $230,551 representing the total payments to these 5 vendors. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 5 from a population of approximately 50 vendors paid in excess of the micro-purchase threshold. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority improve its monitoring of contracts and periodically assess the procurement implications of cumulative payments to frequently used vendors.

Categories

Questioned Costs Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 386894 2023-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 386895 2023-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 386896 2023-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 386897 2023-004
    Material Weakness
  • 963336 2023-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 963337 2023-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 963338 2023-003
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $4.66M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $825,861
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $114,416