Finding 961210 (2023-004)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-26

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Two out of fifteen tenant files (13.3%) did not meet compliance due to errors in income verification and calculation.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with HUD regulations and the Agency’s Administrative Plan regarding tenant file maintenance and income calculations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Conduct a comprehensive file audit for existing tenants and establish a quality control review process to ensure ongoing compliance.

Finding Text

Finding 2023-004 – Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files – Rent Calculations ALN 14.871 – Noncompliance & Significant Deficiency Criteria: Part 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 982, and the Housing Choice Voucher Guidebook give the requirements and guidance for maintaining the tenant files. HUD requires that certain information be obtained from each resident to properly support the rental calculations and prescribes acceptable methods of tenant income calculation. Additionally, the Agency’s Administrative Plan provides guidance on the requirements of the tenant files and how they must be maintained. Condition & Cause: We reviewed fifteen (15) Housing Choice Voucher tenant files and noted two (2) files were not in compliance, or 13.3%. Both instances pertain to the verification or calculation of annual income. In the first file noted, the Agency failed to gather proper third-party verification for a portion of income. In the second file, the Agency conducted an interim reexamination for a decrease in income but failed to remove a portion of the income from the rental charge calculation. Effect: Improper calculation of tenant rental charges can result in misstatement of the financial statements, improper calculation of HAP subsidy, and noncompliance with Federal provisions governing the Housing Choice Voucher program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority conduct a file audit of existing tenants to determine whether there are additional deficiencies. We also recommend that the Authority implement a quality control review to adequately monitor compliance with regulations pertaining to the maintenance of tenant files. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Was sampling statistically valid? Yes

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Significant Deficiency Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 384765 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 384766 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 384767 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 384768 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 384769 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 961207 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 961208 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 961209 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 961211 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $2.12M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $2.04M