Finding 959745 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
L
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-21

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance reporting for federal awards, specifically regarding the HUD 52681-B VMS report.
  • Impacted Requirements: The lack of review before submission violates Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, risking non-compliance with federal program requirements.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a documented review process where a different individual reviews the VMS report before submission, with completion expected by February 2024.

Finding Text

2023-001 - Internal Control over Federal Award – Reporting (VMS) – Significant Deficiency in internal controls over compliance over reporting. ALN and Title: 14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Federal Agency: US Department of Housing and Urban Development Award Year: 2023 Criteria - Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In addition, program reporting requires HUD-52681-B, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement (OMB No. 2577-0169). The PHA submits this form monthly to HUD electronically via the VMS. Congress has instructed HUD to use VMS data to determine renewal funding levels. Condition - The HUD 52681-B VMS report is not reviewed prior to submission. Cause - Because the Authority has few employees they communicate daily and therefore did not recognize the need for review. Effect - Potential non-compliance with program requirements and that non-compliance may go undetected for an extended period of time. Questioned Costs - None Perspective - The documentation of review was not retained for any of the twelve monthly reports. Recommendation - The Authority should establish a clearly documented review process wherein someone other than the preparer reviews the VMS report prior to submission. Management Response: The Authority will have a member of management review VMS submission prior to submission. Estimated Completion Date: February, 2024 Responsible Party: Executive Director, Deputy Director and Assistant Deputy Director.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Reporting Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 383303 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 383304 2023-009
    Significant Deficiency
  • 959746 2023-009
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $9.02M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $1.50M
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $784,877
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $183,833