Finding 959201 (2022-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
L
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2024-03-21

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Authority missed deadlines for submitting critical HUD reports, marking a significant compliance failure.
  • Impacted Requirements: Timely submission of the FASSPHA and SF-SAC is essential for federal funding eligibility and oversight.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Focus on recruiting and training staff, create a contingency plan for personnel changes, and streamline reporting processes to ensure timely submissions.

Finding Text

Finding 2022-002 AL Number and Title: Various—Housing Voucher Cluster – Reporting – Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Criteria: HUD regulations and federal requirements mandate timely submission of the Financial Assessment Subsystem for Public Housing Agencies (FASSPHA) and the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC) for the Single Audit. These submissions are critical for ensuring compliance, enabling oversight, and facilitating the allocation of federal funding. Condition: It was identified during the audit that the Authority did not meet the prescribed deadlines for submitting the FASSPHA and SF-SAC reports to federal agencies. This delay in reporting has been noted for the first time in the current audit period. Cause: The failure to meet reporting deadlines can be attributed to a combination of factors, including major staff turnover, which led to a loss of institutional knowledge and expertise critical for the preparation and submission of these reports. Additionally, a change in auditor who had been instrumental in ensuring timely submissions in the past, with the new auditor becoming unreachable, further exacerbating the situation. These challenges were compounded by inefficiencies in the Authority’s internal processes for report preparation and submission. Effect or Potential Effect: The failure to submit these reports on time undermines the Authority's compliance with federal regulations, potentially affecting its eligibility for future funding and leading to reputational damage. It may also delay financial and operational decisions by HUD that depend on the analysis of these reports. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This lapse was identified against a backdrop of the Authority traditionally maintaining a good track record with reporting. The recent delays mark a departure from their usual compliance practices and have occurred amidst organizational changes and challenges, including staff turnover and procedural adjustments within the finance department. Recommendation: To mitigate this issue, it is recommended that the Authority: (1) Prioritize the recruitment and training of new staff to fill critical roles, ensuring they are well-versed in HUD reporting requirements; (2) Establish a contingency plan for maintaining continuity of operations in the event of key personnel turnover or unavailability; and (3) Revise and streamline internal reporting processes to improve efficiency and reliability in meeting HUD's reporting deadlines. Responsible Official's Response and Corrective Action Planned: Management acknowledges the audit findings and is committed to taking corrective actions.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Eligibility Reporting Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 382757 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 382758 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 382759 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 382760 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 959199 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 959200 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 959202 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $823,818
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $618,290
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $189,465
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $2,546