Finding 947464 (2023-004)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
M
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-02-28
Audit: 292685
Organization: Guilford College (NC)
Auditor: Brown Edwards

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The College lacks a formal policy to document the last date of attendance for students who fail classes, leading to potential misclassification of unofficial withdrawals.
  • Impacted Requirements: Institutions must have procedures to determine if Title IV aid recipients completed their term; without documentation, students are assumed to have unofficially withdrawn.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a policy requiring instructors to document last attendance dates and clarify grading to reflect attendance status, with a corrective action plan due by April 2024.

Finding Text

Treatment of a student who fails to receive a passing grade in any class (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster. Criteria: An institution must have a procedure for determining whether a Title IV aid recipient who began attendance during a period completed the period or should be treated as a withdrawal. If a student who began attendance and has not officially withdrawn fails to earn a passing grade in at least one course offered over an entire period, the school must assume, for Title IV purposes, that the student has unofficially withdrawn, unless the institution can document that the student completed the period. In the absence of evidence of a last day of attendance, a school must consider a student who failed to earn a passing grade in all classes to be an unofficial withdrawal. Condition: From a population of 35 students that received all failing grades in a term, we tested five students and noted that documentation of the last date of attendance could not be provided for any of the students tested. Cause: The College considers students that receive a grade of F to have attended the entire period, however, no written attendance policy exists to this effect and no documentation could be provided to support the last day of the student’s attendance at an academically related subject. Effect: Since there is no formal written policy requiring instructors to utilize different grades for students that fail a class after attending the entire term and for students that failed to attend through the end of the term, it is unclear whether the students attended through the end of the period and whether the students required refunds. Repeat Finding from a Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend the College implement a policy in which instructors are required to retain documentation of a student’s last date of attendance and the grades assigned to a student failing a class indicate whether the student attended through the end of the period or stopped attending prior to the end of the period. In addition, we recommend documentation of a student’s last date of attendance at an academically related class be maintained. Management Response: Agree with finding. Based on review of process, Financial Aid had been emailing to find out whether students had completed work after 50% of the term had been completed, and assuming that any course that did not provide such evidence was an unofficial withdrawal. But we agree that we need to have a more easily verifiable system of documentation of last date of attendance and a corrective action plan will be implemented by April 2024.

Categories

Student Financial Aid Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 371022 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $6.77M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $2.62M
84.031 Higher Education_institutional Aid $471,141
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $189,318
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $160,892
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $110,930
45.310 Grants to States $19,505