Finding 946841 (2022-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2024-02-23
Audit: 291971
Organization: City of Decatur, Alabama (AL)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City failed to verify if business applicants received financial assistance from other sources, risking duplication of benefits under the CDBG-CV grant.
  • Impacted Requirements: Internal controls and recordkeeping procedures for preventing duplication of benefits were not adequately implemented.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The City should establish a verification process for financial assistance claims and maintain proper documentation to ensure compliance.

Finding Text

Recordkeeping Concerning Duplication of Benefits - COVID-19 Community Development Block Grant/Entitlement Grants (AL #14.218) Criteria: Internal controls should be in place under the COVID-19 Community Development Block Grant/Entitlement Grants, to ensure there is not a Duplication of Benefits (DOB) for business assistance activities. All CDBG-CV grantees are required to establish and maintain adequate procedures to prevent any duplication of benefits for assisted activities (as discussed in Section III.B.9. of the CDBG-CV Notice). To demonstrate that no financial assistance has been received or is available to pay costs charged to a CDBG-CV grant, a grantee may demonstrate that no other funds are available for an activity by maintaining records of compliance with mandatory duplication of benefits requirements described in Section III.B.9. Condition and Context: During testing of subawards under activities allowed or unallowed, we noted that the City did not perform their own assessment as to whether business applicants had received financial assistance from other sources. Although they did require applicants to indicate whether other sources had been awarded and accepted or applied for from other sources, an independent review by the City was not conducted to verify these statements. Cause: The City was not aware that of the additional assessment process required to verify the statements made by applicants within their signed applications regarding whether other sources of financial assistance had been utilized or applied for in paying related expenditures. Effects: The City was not in compliance with the recordkeeping requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the City take the necessary steps to verify that no financial assistance has been received or is available to pay costs charged to a CDBG-CV grant for each recipient and maintain the documentation of these results within their files. Auditee’s Response: As noted previously, the City’s Community Development Department is in the process of rewriting its Policies to include the CDBG-CV provisions. Those updated policies will include safeguards to ensure no duplication of benefits will accrue and proper documentation of procedures taken.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 370398 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 370399 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 370400 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 946840 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 946842 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $5.90M
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $382,633
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $302,313
97.056 Port Security Grant Program $51,935
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $31,013
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $30,470
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $17,110
95.001 High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program $9,745
15.904 Historic Preservation Fund Grants-in-Aid $6,685
20.616 State and Community Highway Safety $1,647
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $75