Finding 624564 (2022-002)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-09-26
Audit: 41399
Organization: City of Goshen (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City failed to verify vendor suspension or debarment status for covered transactions exceeding $25,000, lacking necessary internal controls.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations requiring verification of contractors' eligibility before entering into transactions.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a robust internal control system with clear policies and procedures for verifying contractor eligibility to prevent future noncompliance.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): SLT-9293 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The City elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing them to claim its total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $6,692,508 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the City was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. The City's policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements included having a clause in all formal contracts. Formal contracts were then reviewed and approved by the Board of Public Works and Safety and the Mayor prior to making payment. However, the City disclosed they had no policies or procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction, which does not result in a formal contract, is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Two covered transactions, each equaling or exceeding $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period were identified. The first covered transaction was a formal contract. While the contract was reviewed and approved by the Board of Public Works and Safety and the Mayor, no suspension or debarment clause was present in the contract. As such, the City did not verify the vendor was neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities prior to payment. The second covered transaction did not require a formal contract, and, therefore, a formal contract was not entered into. As such, the City did not verify the vendor's suspension or debarment status prior to payment due to the City not having any policies or procedures in place to verity that contractors were neither suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the vendor to whom a payment equal to or in excess of $25,000 was made was not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 48122 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 48123 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 624565 2022-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $501,158
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $155,322
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $153,843
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $52,343
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $8,158
45.025 Promotion of the Arts_partnership Agreements $5,000