Finding 619899 (2022-005)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-08-13
Audit: 40098
Organization: Putnam County (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The County failed to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into contracts exceeding $25,000, due to a lack of internal controls.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with federal regulations on suspension and debarment verification could jeopardize future federal funding.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish a robust system of internal controls and develop clear policies and procedures for verifying contractor eligibility before contract execution.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing the County to claim its total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $7,298,697 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the County in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the County divulged that they were unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements related to the SLFRF awards. A population of four covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period was identified. The total population totaling $549,813 was selected for testing. For each of the four covered transactions, grant files were reviewed, which supported that the County did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment due to the County not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 43456 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 43457 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 43458 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 619898 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 619900 2022-006
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $4.98M
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $678,600
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $335,518
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $163,763
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $110,615
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services_projects of Regional and National Significance $95,591
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $84,461
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $50,562
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $24,526
16.588 Violence Against Women Formula Grants $20,028
16.034 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program $20,005
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $19,335
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $11,940
16.839 Stop School Violence $8,250
97.012 Boating Safety Financial Assistance $6,849
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $4,304