Finding 61753 (2022-001)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-03-12
Audit: 56907
Organization: Arizona Christian University (AZ)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The University failed to report accurate and timely student enrollment data to the NSLDS, affecting 8 out of 40 students tested.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) regarding timely reporting and certification of enrollment status changes.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The University should improve its processes to ensure accurate reporting of enrollment effective dates and timely responses to NSLDS requests.

Finding Text

2022-001 National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster ALN Numbers: Various Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ?Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance ?Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) through an enrollment roster file. The University is required to report changes in the student?s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. In addition, at a minimum, schools are required to certify enrollment every 60 days, and respond within 15 days of the date that NSLDS sends a Roster file to the University or its third-party servicer. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 1 out of the 40 students tested, the program enrollment effective date did not match the University?s records. For 1 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date and program enrollment effective date did not match the University?s records. We also noted 3 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the enrollment effective date per the University?s records. Furthermore, we noted 3 out of the 40 students tested where the student as not reported in a timely manner. These issues impacted 8 out of the 40 students tested. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted the University does not have a process in place to ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The University did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the University?s records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student?s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the University did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-001 Recommendation: We recommend the University reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus and program level is aligning with the University. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Categories

Student Financial Aid Reporting Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 61747 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 61748 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61749 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61750 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 61751 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61752 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61754 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61755 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61756 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 61757 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61758 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61759 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 61760 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 61761 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638189 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 638190 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638191 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638192 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 638193 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638194 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638195 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 638196 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638197 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638198 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 638199 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638200 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638201 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 638202 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 638203 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loan Program $6.56M
84.063 Federal Pell Grants $1.87M
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant Program $85,329
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $53,982
84.379 Teach Grants $50,442