Finding 616303 (2022-003)

Material Weakness
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-04-09
Audit: 38130
Organization: Cedar Valley Services, Inc. (MN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Organization's indirect cost calculation does not align with the state-approved cost allocation, leading to under-allocation of funds to the grant.
  • Impacted Requirements: Costs allocated include unallowable expenses like advertising and depreciation, violating Uniform Guidance regulations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The Organization should review and amend its cost allocation policy or update calculations to ensure compliance with the approved plan.

Finding Text

2022 ? 003: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal program: Formula Grants for Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number: 20.509C Award Period: 1/1/2022 ? 12/31/2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Guidance allows nonprofit organizations to use an indirect cost rate allocation that is approved by the grantor. The costs being allocated must not include unallowable costs. Condition: The Organization?s indirect cost calculation does not match the cost allocation approved by the state. This has resulted in less indirect costs being allocated to the grant compared to what is allowed based on the approved allocation plan. In addition, advertising and depreciation costs are included in the amount allocated to the grant which are not allowable costs. Questioned costs: None Context: We selected three months of allocation calculations, noting none of them to match the Organization?s cost allocation policy approved by the grantor. Cause: The Organization has not taken steps to correct the calculation being used to allocate indirect costs. Effect: Using the current cost allocation method versus the approved plan has resulted in less costs being allocated to the grant than what is allowed under the plan. This has resulted in the Organization needing to pay back unused funds that could have otherwise been allocated to the grant. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization review its policy and determine if there needs to be an amendment to its policy, or the calculations need to be updated to reflect the approved policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 39861 2022-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $1.37M
93.498 Provider Relief Fund $675,716
20.500 Federal Transit_capital Investment Grants $70,984