Finding 614393 (2022-004)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-09-04
Audit: 29568
Organization: Commonwealth Ports Authority (MP)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: $20,000 in premium pay was improperly given to employees not classified as essential workers, violating Treasury guidelines.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 31 CFR Part 35 is necessary for using program funds for premium pay; specific criteria must be met.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Ensure all personnel review subrecipient agreements and seek guidance on fund usage before making expenditures.

Finding Text

Finding No.: 2022-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: CNMI Government Assistance Listings Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Nos.: CNMI22027 Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Questioned Costs: $20,000 Criteria: In accordance with 31 CFR Part 35 (Treasury?s Final Rule), recipients may use payments from Program funds to provide premium pay for essential workers if each eligible worker falls into one of three categories: 1) The worker?s pay is below the wage threshold, 2) the worker is not exempt from the FSLA overtime provisions, or 3) the recipient has submitted a written justification to Treasury (or to the pass-through entity). Essential worker is defined as those employees who face greater risk of exposure due to the pandemic and those workers who continue to bear the risk of maintaining the ongoing operation of vital facilities and services. Condition: Tests of twenty-five expenditures, aggregating $1,067,404 of a population of $1,962,016, noted that for four (or 16%), premium pay was paid to employees not deemed essential workers, as follows: "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Cause: CPA did not adhere to the essential worker requirements based on the Treasury?s Final Rule. Effect: CPA is in noncompliance with activities allowed or unallowed. Recommendation: Prior to expending federal funds from a pass-through entity, responsible personnel should read the terms and conditions of the subrecipient agreement and seek guidance, if necessary, on the use of the funds. Views of Responsible Officials: CPA?s Corrective Action Plan provides a detailed rationale for disagreement with this finding. Auditor response: When CPA received the subrecipient terms and conditions in May 2022, which included ??ensuring compliance with US Treasury?s rules and guidelines found in the Act and the Final Rule,? CPA should have reassessed the premium pay expenditures for compliance.

Categories

Questioned Costs Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 37948 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 37949 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 37950 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 37951 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 37952 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 614390 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 614391 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 614392 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 614394 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
97.U01 Electronic Baggage Screening Program $7.57M
20.106 Airport Improvement Program $5.15M
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.96M
97.072 National Explosives Detection Canine Team Program (nedctp) $150,516
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $139,637
97.U02 Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program $36,017
97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant $14,944