Finding 612663 (2022-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2022-12-26
Audit: 26205
Organization: Second Harvest Heartland (MN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance with federal funding requirements.
  • Impacted Requirements: The lack of documented review for purchase orders violates 2 CFR 200.303, which mandates effective internal controls for managing federal awards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The sourcing director should implement a monthly review process for purchase orders and item numbers, ensuring documentation of this review.

Finding Text

Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027?American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Pass-Through Entities and Award Numbers: Minnesota Department of Agriculture, award number 207317 Minnesota Department of Human Services, award number 208490. Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs. Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 of Subpart D, "Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management," of the Uniform Guidance requires a nonfederal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs and Cost Principles. Condition: Processes and procedures in place to track spending on the grant did not include a specifically documented review or approval of item numbers or purchase orders. Cause: One individual places purchase orders and enters purchase information in a tracking spreadsheet. Invoices are prepared from the tracking spreadsheet. Item numbers are created to track allowable items but no review is required. A manager has overall oversight but no specific review is documented. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable costs or activities could be charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: None Context: No documented review or approval control was identified. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the sourcing director begin reviewing purchase orders and item numbers used in the program and document such review on at least a monthly basis. Views of Responsible Officials: Agree and controls have now been implemented.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 36221 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 36222 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 36223 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 36224 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 36225 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 612664 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 612665 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 612666 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 612667 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.569 Emergency Food Assistance Program (food Commodities) $12.85M
10.565 Commodity Supplemental Food Program $5.00M
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.25M
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $510,315
10.568 Emergency Food Assistance Program (administrative Costs) $278,657
10.576 Senior Farmers Market Nutrition Program $5,285