Finding 607786 (2022-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
P
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-04-24
Audit: 33790
Organization: Civil Air Patrol (AL)
Auditor: Warren Averett

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Manual consolidation of financial statements is prone to errors, leading to discrepancies in key financial areas.
  • Impacted Requirements: Inaccurate WFA workbooks affect fixed assets, accounts payable, contribution revenue, and net assets.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a review process for WFA workbooks, including a standardized checklist and locking down finalized items to prevent changes.

Finding Text

Criteria/Condition: CAP?s consolidated financial statements include CAP National Headquarters (NHQ), CAP Wings and Regions (Wings) as well as the CAP Foundation. These components are consolidated into the financial statements through various manually updated excel workbooks and consolidating entries. Wing Financial Analysts (WFA) are assigned from eight to twelve Wings. The Wing consolidation is performed by each WFA manually combining their assigned Wings? QuickBooks accounting history for the year in an excel workbook. These WFA workbooks are then manually combined into the Wing consolidated workbook. The WFA workbooks were not accurately updated. Cause/Effect: The Wing consolidation is a manual process which, by nature is prone to error. As a result, several discrepancies related to fixed assets, accounts payable, other liabilities, contribution revenue and net assets released from restrictions were noted in the WFA workbooks. These items were subsequently corrected by management. Recommendation: We recommend CAP evaluate current policies and procedures to ensure that the WFA workbooks and Wing consolidation are accurate and free from discrepancy. This process should include a review of the WFA workbooks by someone other than the preparer as well as an overall review of the Wing consolidated workbook. Once items are set for review, they should be locked down to prevent any unapproved changes. To facilitate this review process, CAP should consider creating a standardized review checklist. This checklist would not only assist in the review, but also document the reviewer as well as the date of the review.

Categories

No categories assigned yet.

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 31343 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 31344 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 607785 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
12.840 Civil Air Patrol Program $67.80M
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $123,857