Finding 596721 (2022-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-09-28
Audit: 24014
Organization: City of Peekskill (NY)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The PHA failed to conduct required annual inspections for housing units, with only four out of seventeen failing units reinspected.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with Housing Quality Standards (HQS) inspections and enforcement may jeopardize the PHA's goals for providing safe housing.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The PHA needs to hire a qualified housing inspector to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and improve inspection processes.

Finding Text

Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Housing Choice Voucher Program Assistance Listing Number 14.871 Finding: 2022-001 Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) Inspections and HQS Enforcement (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b)). For units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA-approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. For family-caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). Condition: The PHAs failed inspection log noted seventeen units failed HQS inspection. It appears only four units were reinspected. The PHA?s tenant files did not have evidence or other verification documenting that any PHA-required repairs were completed. Cause: For the calendar year under audit, January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022, the PHA did not have a housing inspector from September 2022 until the year end. At the time of the auditors? field work the PHA had not hired an inspector and the responsibility has fallen to the Section 8 Director. Effect or Potential Effect: The PHA is out compliance with Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) Inspections and HQS Enforcement and may not meet its 5 Year Plan goals to provide improved living environment to: ? Ensure that all units meet the Housing Quality Standards ? Provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing for very low-income families ? Conduct more supervisory housing standards inspections to ensure safety of the participants Recommendation: The PHA must hire an inspector who is qualified and certified to perform HUD?s job requirements. The inspector is required to take and pass the Inspector (Housing) Civil Service Exam when posted. Management?s Response: See corrective action plan.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 20279 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 20280 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 596722 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $1.09M
93.045 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part C_nutrition Services $138,714
17.274 Youthbuild $126,288
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $97,057
17.259 Wia Youth Activities $80,915
93.276 Drug-Free Communities Support Program Grants $63,429
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $47,999
93.787 Title V Sexual Risk Avoidance Education Program (discretionary Grants) $20,282