Finding 593158 (2022-001)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-08-01
Audit: 21367
Organization: Henry County (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The County lacked a system to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred before making payments over $25,000 from federal funds.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations requiring verification of contractor eligibility was not met, risking future federal funding.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish and implement a robust internal control system with clear policies and procedures for verifying vendor status before contracts or payments.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year or Other Identifying Number: FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing the County to claim its total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $9,500,777 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds during the audit period were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF funds, recipients are required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the County in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the County divulged that they had no process in place. A population of 12 covered transactions for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of 2 transactions, totaling $728,649 was selected for testing. For each of the 2 transactions, the County did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment due to the County not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions identified, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to expand the sample size or perform any additional audit procedures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 16716 2022-001
    Material Weakness
  • 16717 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 593159 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $3.33M
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $422,016
20.106 Airport Improvement Program $393,707
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $250,561
66.818 Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreements $87,902
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $72,739
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $68,268
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $53,824
93.498 Provider Relief Fund $53,821
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $30,157
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $15,802
93.788 Opioid Str $14,797
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $3,770