Finding 588639 (2022-001)

Material Weakness
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-07-24

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District prepaid vendors for services before they were rendered, totaling $492,800, which may violate federal cost principles.
  • Impacted Requirements: Payments made do not align with OMB guidelines requiring costs to be necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The District should consult with the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education for guidance and strengthen internal controls over expenditures.

Finding Text

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PASSED THROUGH ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TITLE I GRANTS TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES - AL NUMBER 84.010A PASS-THROUGH NUMBER 6201 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022 Criteria or specific requirement: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2 CFR part 200, subpart E - Cost Principles establish principles for determining the allowable costs incurred by the District under Federal awards. Such costs are to be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal Award and be adequately documented. Condition: The District paid three vendors for professional and consulting services before services were rendered. These vendors were paid $269,600, $186,400, and $36,800, respectively, from Title I federal awards. Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight over program expenditures. Effect or potential effect: Unallowable costs were paid from the Title I program for professional and consultant services. Questioned costs: The amount of questioned costs was unable to be determined. Context: An examination of contracts totaling $492,800 for professional and consulting services. Recommendation: The District should contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education for guidance regarding this matter and implement proper controls over program expenditures. Views of responsible officials: All services prepaid were rendered and properly documented, i.e., sign in sheets and agendas. It should be noted that the district believes it received approval from the pass-through entity to prepay based on verbal and email guidance of the Public-School Program Manager from DESE public school accountability department. The purpose of prepayment was to avoid returning funds as advised. (Email Documentation can be provided) In addition, Solution Tree, a state approved partner, sent an email as recently as April 3, 2023 outlining districts options to "Pre-pay years of PD with federal funds". (Documentation can be provided). While Solution Tree is not the pass-through agency it is a highly recommended partner for professional development in the state. As a result, the district is scheduled to meet with DESE prior to the publishing of the audit given a final determination must be made by DESE. However, the district will review payments to vendors in the future to ensure that services have been rendered prior to payment regardless of additional guidance.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 12197 2022-001
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $3.23M
10.553 School Breakfast Program $620,357
84.358 Rural Education $388,359
32.009 Emergency Connectivity Fund Program $232,179
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants $143,077
10.555 National School Lunch Program $90,310
10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program $85,444
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $63,016
84.011 Migrant Education_state Grant Program $18,113
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $14,520
84.425 Covid-19 - Education Stabilization Fund $2,600