Finding 585536 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-01-19

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: 8.7% of tenant files reviewed were non-compliant due to income calculation errors and lack of third-party verification.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations and the Housing Authority's Administrative Plan regarding tenant file documentation.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Conduct a thorough audit of tenant files and enhance quality control reviews to ensure compliance with regulations.

Finding Text

Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program - ALN #14.871, Grant Year 2022 & 2023 Condition & Cause: We reviewed one hundred fifteen (115) Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files and noted ten (10) files not in compliance, or 8.7%. All errors were income related and consisted of failure to correctly calculate tenant income and failure to obtain third-party verification of income. The income calculation and verification deficiencies were the result of employee error, and failure by the Agency to properly review and correct the errors. We noted that the Agency struggled with hiring, training, and retaining quality staff and operated with several employee vacancies during the fiscal year. We were able to extrapolate the total potential misstatement and found it to be immaterial to the financial statements. However, due to the percentage of files not in compliance, we feel the Agency has a significant deficiency in this area. Criteria: The Code of Federal regulations, the Housing Authority's Administrative Plan and specific HUD guidelines in documenting and maintaining Housing Choice Voucher tenant files. Effect: Improper calculation and documentation of tenant income can result in misstatement of the financial statements, improper calculation of HAP subsidy, and noncompliance with Federal provisions governing the Housing Choice Voucher program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency conduct a thorough tenant file audit of existing tenants to determine whether there are additional deficiencies. We also recommend that the Agency increase their quality control review to adequately monitor compliance with local and federal regulations as it pertains to the maintenance of the tenant files. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Was sampling statistically valid? Yes Views of responsible officials: The PHA agrees with the results of the audit and recommendations.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Significant Deficiency Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 9094 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $4.39M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $3.77M
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $470,162
14.182 Section 8 New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation $116,916
10.427 Rural Rental Assistance Payments $78,822
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $62,257