Finding 580837 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2023-12-15

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The PHA did not follow the required abatement process for units that failed Housing Quality Standards (HQS) inspections.
  • Impacted Requirements: Units must be re-inspected within 30 days of failing HQS, and abatement should start if deficiencies are not corrected in that timeframe.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement controls to ensure abatement begins after 30 days for failed inspections to maintain compliance with HQS standards.

Finding Text

Criteria: The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)). Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA-approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family-caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). Effect: The Authority was non-complianent with required abatement process under HQS standards on these files tested. However, ultimately the inspection were passed and abatement was avoided. Recommendations: We recommend abatement process begins once 30 days has passed on failed inspection to ensure compliance with HQS standards. Management Views: Management agrees. Condition: We identified four (4) failed HQS that did not complete re-inspection within the 30 days. Context: We selected a sample of 29 failed inspections of a total of 299 failed inspections that occurred during the fiscal year. Out of the 29 samples selected, 4 of those failed to follow-up on inspection with in 30 days. All were passed within 60 days resulting in no required abatement of rent. Cause: Controls were not in place to start the abatement process once the failed inspection passed the 30 day period.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 4395 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $8.06M
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $5.23M
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $4.10M
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $1.01M
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $668,284
14.182 Section 8 New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation $601,791
93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance $453,538
81.042 Weatherization Assistance for Low-Income Persons $448,167
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $249,731
14.870 Resident Opportunity and Supportive Services - Service Coordinators $121,249
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $62,116
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $5,698
93.602 Assets for Independence Demonstration Program $389