Finding 573249 (2022-004)

- Repeat Finding
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2025-08-11
Audit: 364051
Organization: Tucson Audubon Society (AZ)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: An incorrect indirect cost rate of 17.5% was charged to federal awards instead of the approved 10% rate.
  • Impacted Requirements: This violates 2 CFR 200.414, which mandates the use of the negotiated or de minimis indirect cost rate consistently across federal awards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should ensure the correct indirect cost rate is applied and that all costs align with federally approved budgets moving forward.

Finding Text

Compliance Requirement: A/B Condition: I noted that an indirect rate of 17.5% percent was charged to federal awards instead of the 10% rate approved in the grant awards. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.414, Indirect Costs, require non-Federal entities to apply the negotiated indirect cost rate, or the de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (MTDC) if elected and applicable, consistently to all eligible federal awards. Cause and effect: The application of the incorrect indirect cost rate has resulted in unallowable charges to the federal award. Recommendation: I recommend management ensure that the proper indirect cost rate is properly applied in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and ensures that appropriate costs are charged to the awards consistent with their federally approved budgets. Views of Responsible Officials: Upon conducting the FY21 audit, TAS’ Director of Finance was informed that the inclusion of the Biological Expertise line item on federal budgets (approximately 7.5% additional uplift) was not allowable as it was currently being calculated. TAS is allowed a 10% de minimus rate on noted FY22 Federal awards some of which also included a Biological Expertise line item that is budgeted as an hourly rate. TAS had been calculating uplift amounts owed by simply adding the Biological Expertise (7.5%) to the de minimus rate (10%) for a total uplift of 17.5%. This was done at the direction and approval of our federal partners. However, due to Biological Expertise being entered in the federal and approved budgets as an hourly line item and not a percentage TAS was considered out of compliance by using this method of calculation. Moving forward TAS will be billing the de minimus rate (10%) as a percentage, unless otherwise noted in the agreement.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
15.945 Cooperative Research and Training Programs – Resources of the National Park System $101,666
15.944 Natural Resource Stewardship $28,174
15.954 National Park Service Conservation, Protection, Outreach, and Education $75