Finding 573122 (2024-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-08-08
Audit: 363933
Organization: Barton County, Kansas (KS)
Auditor: Adamsbrown LLC

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The County used a noncompetitive procurement method without proper written approval or valid justification, violating federal procurement requirements.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompetitive procurement must comply with 2 CFR 200.320, which outlines specific conditions under which it can be used.
  • Recommended Follow-up: The County should seek written approval for noncompetitive methods and update its procurement policy to align with federal guidelines.

Finding Text

SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2024-001 10.855 – Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Criteria or specific requirement Procurement methods should follow the requirements laid out at 2 CFR 200.320. Noncompetitive procurement methods should only be used if one of the following circumstances applies: the aggregate amount of the procurement transaction does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; the procurement transaction can only be fulfilled by a single source; the public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from providing public notice of a competitive solicitation; the recipient or subrecipient requests in writing to use a noncompetitive procurement method, and the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides written approval; or, after soliciting several sources, competition is deemed inadequate. Condition The County used a noncompetitive procurement method without receiving written approval or meeting one of the other allowable circumstances for a procurement that was greater than a micro-purchase but less than the simplified acquisition threshold. Context The County’s procurement policy allows for noncompetitive procurements in specified circumstances, including when the procurement is for services from a provider with unique knowledge, skill, or ability not available from other sources; when the procurement is for goods and services where standardization is beneficial for reasons including maintenance, repair, training, and inoperability; and when the procurement is for goods and services where continuity of providers’ efficiency or critical knowledge is preferable and other providers of the goods and services cannot provide similar efficiency or critical knowledge. County staff felt that they had sufficiently met these three circumstances, and they used that justification to proceed with a noncompetitive procurement. Cause The County was following its procurement policy and did not note that there were some key differences between it and when noncompetitive procurements are allowable when using federal funding. Effect The County did not allow for full and open competition. Recommendation Whenever possible, we recommend that the County request written permission from the awarding agency if it seeks to use noncompetitive procurement methods for grants. We also recommend that the County consider updating its procurement policy to make it clear that the circumstances in which noncompetitive procurements can be used with federal assistance differ from normal circumstances. Views of responsible officials See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-001 Federal program 10.855 – Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Condition The County used a noncompetitive procurement method without receiving written approval or meeting one of the other allowable circumstances for a procurement that was greater than a micro-purchase but less than the simplified acquisition threshold. Recommendation Whenever possible, we recommend that the County request written permission from the awarding agency if it seeks to use noncompetitive procurement methods for grants. We also recommend that the County consider updating its procurement policy to make it clear that the circumstances in which noncompetitive procurements can be used with federal assistance differ from normal circumstances. Comments on the Finding Recommendation The County is aware of the finding and will take steps to mitigate the risk of this happening again in the future. Action Taken Before the end of calendar year 2025, the County’s procurement policy will be updated to clarify when noncompetitive methods can be used with federal funding. Additionally, all staff involved with grant management have been instructed to request written documentation from awarding agencies whenever they are attempting to use noncompetitive procurement methods.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1149564 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $302,422
10.557 Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $262,190
10.855 Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants $185,745
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $168,002
93.276 Drug-Free Communities Support Program Grants $132,856
90.404 Hava Election Security Grants $83,267
93.217 Family Planning Services $76,199
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $67,215
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $61,566
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $49,034
16.812 Second Chance Act Reentry Initiative $32,832
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $29,199
93.967 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration with Academia to Strengthen Public Health $28,326
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $21,744
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $19,474
93.590 Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Grants $14,396
93.991 Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant $11,409
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $9,843