Finding 569970 (2024-003)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
L
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-07-01
Audit: 361239
Organization: City of Marco Island (FL)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City lacks a formal review and approval process for quarterly progress reports submitted for federal disaster grants.
  • Impacted Requirements: This deficiency violates compliance standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) and 200.303(a), risking inaccurate submissions and potential penalties.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a structured review process, train staff, ensure adequate resources, and develop clear guidelines to enhance compliance.

Finding Text

Federal Agency: Department of Homeland Security Federal Program Name: Disaster Grant Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 Grant Award Number: 4337DR-FL-2024 Award Period: Various Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) states that records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the” Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: It was observed that quarterly progress reports lacked documentation of review and approval by management prior to submission to the granting agency. Questioned Costs: None. Context: All quarterly progress reports selected for testing lacked documented review and approval. Cause: The City has not established formal policies and procedures for the review and approval process. Effect: The lack of a proper review and approval process for grant quarterly progress report submissions can result in the submission of inaccurate and incomplete reimbursement requests and reports, which may lead to non-compliance with grant requirements and potential financial penalties. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the organization implement a review and approval process for all quarterly progress report submissions. This should include: - Training staff on the importance of the review and approval process. - Ensuring adequate staffing levels to handle the review process. - Developing clear guidelines and procedures for the review and approval process. - Regularly monitoring and auditing the review process to ensure compliance. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. See Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Disaster Grant Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) - Assistance Listing No. 97.036 Recommendation: We recommend that the organization implement a review and approval process for all quarterly progress submissions. This should include: Training staff on the importance of the review and approval process. Ensuring adequate staffing levels to handle the review process. Developing clear guidelins and procedures for the review and approval process. Regularly monitoring and auditing the review process to ensure compliance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The City will implement a review and approval process for all quarterly progress report submissions within it ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) software system. The City will train its staff on the importance of the review and approval process. The City will ensure adequate staffing levels to handle the review process. The City will develop clear guidelines and procedures for the review and approval process. The City will regularly monitor and audit the reivew process to ensure compliance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) for corrective action: Guillermo Polanco. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 09/30/2025

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring Cash Management Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 569971 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1146412 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1146413 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $656,859
97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant $2,970