Finding 565391 (2024-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-06-19

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: CSC lacks proper documentation and controls to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred before contracts are signed.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 and 2 CFR Part 180.220 regarding suspension and debarment verification is not being met.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Implement consistent policies to verify vendor status and consider adding clauses in contracts for vendor self-certification on suspension and debarment status.

Finding Text

2024-002 Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. and Department of Treasury Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: October 1, 2023 to September 30, 2024 • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of suspension and debarment. 2 CFR Part 180.220, states that recipients of federal funds are prohibited from contracting with or making sub awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) Checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM; (2) Collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. CSC should have internal controls designed and effectively operating to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted CSC did not maintain support to show its review of the search for suspension and debarment was done before contracts were entered into. CSC did not have effective controls to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Context: For four out of four vendors tested, we noted that documentation related to suspension and debarment verification was not documented. However, our testing did not identify any vendors that had been suspended or debarred. Cause: The policies and procedures surrounding suspension and debarment verification were not consistently followed as designed. Effect: CLA noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of effective internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend CSC ensure consistent application of its policies and procedures so that an adequate verification process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract. Alternatively, a clause can be added to CSC’s standard procurement contracts requiring CSC’s potential vendors to attest to whether they have been suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. CSC’s has updated its policy as of April 2025 to state that a contract or subgrant must not be made to parties listed on the government-wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM). CSC must confirm that all new contractors, consultants, and subrecipients are not listed in SAM Exclusions.

Corrective Action Plan

U.S. and Department of Treasury 2024-001 and 2024-002 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend CSC update procurement policies to ensure they align with federal requirements. This includes clear guidelines on competitive bidding and documenting the rationale for vendor selection. Also, the policy should ensure consistent application of its policies and procedures so that an adequate verification process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are suspended or debarred before entering into a covered transaction. Explanation of disagreement with audit findings: See below action taken in response to findings. Action taken in response to findings: CSC disagrees with the classification of 2004-001 as a significant finding rather than receiving management recommendations on improving our procedures from the auditors because there was only one item where CSC could not retrieve the proof that at least three bids were sought prior to the signing of the contract. CSC does not consider the three other items that the auditors flagged as clear procurements because two of the items were disbursements of funds on behalf of clients for vocational education that those clients had already signed up for and were preapproved by the funder in question. CSC had no option but to disburse funds for those educational activities. The rational for the disbursements can be found in the grant agreement. Similarly in the case of the third item, CSC had to disburse funds based on the criteria provided by the grantor and the grantor approved the transaction prior to its signing. These are grey areas that deserve no more than formal management recommendations. Regardless, based on the results of the audit, CSC has updated its procurement policy for grant related purchases to align with federal requirements by increasing the spending threshold that requires obtaining bids from at least three vendors or service providers from $5,000 to $10,000. CSC’s updated procurement policy as of April 2025 states in part that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for the procurement of services, supplies, or other property that cost more than $10,000 but no more than $250,000. Generally, a minimum of three bids should be obtained and documented. Procurements over $250,000 require the use of Competitive Proposals. Additionally, under the caption of “Debarment and Suspension, CSC’s policy states that a contract or subgrant must not be made to parties listed on the government-wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM). CSC must confirm that all new contractors, consultants, and subrecipients are not listed in SAM Exclusions. The revised policy is attached. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Tayo Coker Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 3, 2024. If the U.S. and Department of Treasury has questions regarding this plan, please call: Tayo Coker 202-603-3259.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 565389 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 565390 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 565392 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1141831 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1141832 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1141833 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1141834 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
16.818 Children Exposed to Violence $294,386
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $280,980
93.590 Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Grants $150,000
93.569 Community Services Block Grant $139,215
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $100,000
93.645 Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program $32,000