Finding 564612 (2024-011)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-06-12

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Funds were not allocated according to federal requirements, with schools below 75% poverty receiving more per pupil than those above 75%.
  • Impacted Requirements: Lack of sufficient documentation makes it unclear if the School is complying with Title I, Part A of the ESEA regarding fund allocation.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a process for proper fund allocation and maintain detailed documentation for transparency, especially for any unallocated funds.

Finding Text

Statement of condition: Management was unable to provide sufficient documentation evidencing the proper allocation of funds in accordance with federal ranking and allocation requirements. Criteria: Under Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), funds must be allocated to eligible schools in rank order based on the percentage of students from low-income families. The allocation process must ensure that the highest-poverty schools, those above 75 percent poverty, are served before any schools with a poverty percentage at or below 75 percent. Sufficient documentation must be maintained to verify compliance with these requirements. According to federal regulations, school districts must provide clear documentation and justification for the allocation process. Cause of condition: The School did not allocate funds to eligible schools in rank order. Schools with poverty levels below 75 percent were allocated more funds per pupil than schools with poverty levels above 75 percent, and management was unable to produce supporting documentation and justification regarding the allocation of funds. Effect of condition: Without proper documentation of the allocation of Title I, Part A funds, it is difficult to determine whether the School is in compliance with federal requirements. It cannot be verified that funds were correctly allocated in accordance with the poverty ranking of eligible schools. Additionally, failure to allocate funds properly could lead to the under-serving of eligible students, impacting educational opportunities for students from low-income families. Context: Management provided documentation of their 2023-2024 Title I, Part A budget that was entered into the Federal Grant Management System. According to the provided documentation, schools with poverty levels below 75 percent were allocated more funds per pupil than schools with poverty levels above 75 percent. Additionally, there was $751,709 of available funds that were not allocated to schools. Recommendation: The School should implement a process to ensure all Title I, Part A funds are properly allocated to eligible schools in accordance with the federal ranking requirements. Furthermore, the School should maintain detailed documentation and justification for any unallocated funds to ensure transparency and accountability. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with this finding and will put procedures in place to ensure the proper allocation of funds and maintain sufficient documentation evidencing the proper allocation.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with this finding and will put procedures in place to ensure the proper allocation of funds and maintain sufficient documentation evidencing the proper allocation. Action Plan:  The school will ensure that all monies for Title I funding are allocated correctly and based on percentages that comply with the federal ranking requirements.  The school will also properly document unallocated funds and provide adequate justifications to ensure transparency and accountability.  The allocation review will be implemented by April 30, 2025, with a monthly review.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 564605 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 564606 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 564607 2024-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 564608 2024-007
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 564609 2024-008
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 564610 2024-009
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 564611 2024-010
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1141047 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1141048 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1141049 2024-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1141050 2024-007
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1141051 2024-008
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1141052 2024-009
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1141053 2024-010
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1141054 2024-011
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $4.68M
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $1.70M
10.553 School Breakfast Program $484,343
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $322,144
10.555 National School Lunch Program $50,164
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $39,384
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $11,872
10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program $1,342