Finding 564145 (2024-001)

Material Weakness
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-06-09

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District failed to comply with the Davis-Bacon Act by not including necessary wage rate provisions in contracts for projects funded by the COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund.
  • Impacted Requirements: Contracts over $2,000 must ensure compliance with Federal wage rates and require weekly certified payroll reports to verify payment of prevailing wages.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement controls to ensure all prime construction contracts include wage rate provisions and establish a process for obtaining weekly certified payroll reports from contractors.

Finding Text

2 CFR § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education (DOE) for Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200 which states, in part, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following: (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. Lack of effective controls led to the District expending AL# 84.425 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund federal grant funds on the following projects which did not meet the requirements of the Davis Bacon Act: • $34,500 for an asphalt parking lot at the health clinic. The District did not enter into a written agreement with the contractor which contained a provision to ensure the contractor complied with Federal wage rate requirements. Further, the District did not obtain weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis. • $2,975 for a new sidewalk at the health clinic. The District did not enter into a written agreement with the contractor which contained a provision to ensure the contractor complied with Federal wage rate requirements. Further, the District did not obtain weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor to verify prevailing wages were paid on a weekly basis. The above-listed noncompliance also resulted in a qualified opinion over the AL# 84.425 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund program. Failure to have effective controls in place over wage-rate requirements may result in the District and its contractors or subcontractors failing to pay prevailing wages when required by Federal law and could result in reduction of future Federal funding or other sanctions imposed by Federal grantors. When required by Federal grant legislation, the District should ensure prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid with Federal grant monies contain provisions that require the contractor to comply with wage rate requirements. Further, the District should ensure certified payroll reports are provided weekly by the contractor.

Categories

Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Subrecipient Monitoring HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 564143 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 564144 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 1140585 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 1140586 2024-001
    Material Weakness
  • 1140587 2024-001
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $521,054
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $519,206
10.553 School Breakfast Program $198,431
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $147,237
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $88,602
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $85,077
10.555 National School Lunch Program $53,615
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $12,709
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $326