Finding 561407 (2024-002)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-05-22

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The District lacked adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement and suspension/debarment requirements when purchasing food.
  • Impacted Requirements: Failure to verify procurement methods and contractor eligibility led to potential noncompliance with federal regulations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen internal controls to ensure compliance with procurement requirements and verify contractor status for all purchases over $25,000.

Finding Text

Castle Rock School District No. 401 September 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024 2024-002 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2023-001 Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $750,680 to administer these programs during the 2023-2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. State and federal requirements allow local entities to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement or cooperative. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm that the procurement methods the awarding agency followed met its own statutory procurement laws and followed regulations applicable to the District when selecting the contractor. Additionally, to make a valid piggybacking transaction, the District must purchase goods or services from the contractor that the original entity awarded the contract to through its own procurement process. Additionally, federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the District enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that the contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The District may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The District must perform this verification before entering into the contract, and it must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition The District did not have a process to ensure it complied with procurement requirements when purchasing food. The District piggybacked onto a purchasing cooperative’s contract and a neighboring school district’s contract for food and dairy products; however, the District did not confirm that the procurement methods the awarding agencies followed met its own statutory procurement requirements before purchasing. Additionally, the District did not have a process in place to ensure it only purchased products that were awarded through the awarding entities’ contracts at the established price. Additionally, although the District has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays more than $25,000, our audit found the District could not demonstrate it verified all three contractors were not suspended or debarred before purchasing from them. We consider these deficiencies in internal controls to be material weaknesses that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition The District was unaware of the piggybacking requirements until it received a finding in the prior audit. Due to the timing of the prior audit, the District had already begun purchasing off the new contracts. Additionally, the District experienced turnover in the Director of Fiscal Services position, and current staff could not locate documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Effect of Condition The District piggybacked on three contracts without reviewing bid documentation and spent about $128,000 of federal funds to purchase food and dairy products. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with piggybacking federal procurement requirements, allowed for full and open competition, and received the current contract price for the food purchases. The District did not obtain written certification from the contractors, insert a clause into the contract or retain evidence that it checked for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify contractors it paid $435,630 using federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting. Without adequate internal controls, the District increases its risk of awarding federal funds to contractors that are excluded from participating in federal programs. Any payments the District made to an ineligible party would be unallowable, and the federal agency could potentially recover them. We subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls to ensure it complies with applicable procurement requirements for purchases of goods and services. Additionally, we recommend the District strengthen its internal controls to verify all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs and maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this requirement. District’s Response The District will conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in procurement on federal regulations, including how to check vendors against the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) for suspension or debarment. The District will also establish a procurement review checklist to be completed by the vendor and staff. Send out yearly with request of updated w-9 the vendor acknowledgment with debarment statement. Review debarment statues yearly. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the District for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it is taking to address these concerns. We will review the status of the District’s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations, implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment School Nutrition Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 561404 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 561405 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 561406 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 561408 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 561409 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 561410 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 561411 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 561412 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 561413 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1137846 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1137847 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1137848 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1137849 2024-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1137850 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1137851 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1137852 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1137853 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1137854 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1137855 2024-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $354,481
10.553 School Breakfast Program $170,353
84.425 Covid 19 - Education Stabilization Fund $86,942
10.555 National School Lunch Program $64,977
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $28,848
32.009 Covid 19 - Emergency Connectivity Fund Program $23,100
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $17,924
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $5,033
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $4,999
10.665 Schools and Roads - Grants to States $4,323