Finding 561273 (2023-003)

Material Weakness
Requirement
ABH
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2025-05-22

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Knott County Fiscal Court failed to maintain proper FEMA documentation for federal funding, leading to noncompliance.
  • Impacted Requirements: Violations of federal regulations regarding documentation, allowable costs, and project oversight resulted in $1,212,805 in questioned costs.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement stronger internal controls and maintain comprehensive documentation for all project activities to ensure compliance with federal requirements.

Finding Text

Knott County Fiscal Court Did Not Maintain Proper FEMA Documentation Federal Program: Assistance Listing #97.036 FEMA Public Assistance Program Award Number and Year: FEMA-4663DRKYP00000001 2022 Name of Federal Agency and Pass-Thru Agency: U. S. Department of Homeland Security and State Department of Military Affairs Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Amount of Questioned Costs: $1,212,805 COVID Related: No Knott County had severe flooding in July of 2022. This event qualified Knott County Fiscal Court to receive federal funding to recover from the disaster. Paperwork is maintained to document and track work that is necessary and to determine the portion eligible for coverage by FEMA. The fiscal court did not maintain proper FEMA documentation. Out of 36 disbursements tested, 11 did not have any accompanying information that would detail the expected scope of work or cost. The 11 disbursements that did not have appropriate documentation totaled $1,212,805 in questioned cost. The fiscal court has not sufficiently overseen the expenditure of federal funds and did not prioritize the implementation of an effective internal control system. Tracking of the FEMA projects was consistently executed on completed projects but was not available for the in-progress projects that were tested. The lack of documentation to appropriately connect the disbursements to FEMA authorized work resulted in the determination that the county was not in compliance with the applicable attributes. An inaccurate implementation of controls and the lack of management oversight and involvement can cause noncompliance with federal requirements and jeopardize the fiscal court’s future funding. The lack of appropriate documentation also prevented the ability to rely on supplementary information, such as the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. 2 CFR part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, And Audit Requirements For Federal Awards provides guidance on Federal regulations pertaining to Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.306, regarding cost sharing or matching, states that any shared costs or matching funds must meet all of the following criteria: verifiable from the non-Federal entity’s records; not included as contributions for any other Federal award; necessary and reasonable for accomplishment of project or program objectives; allowable under subpart E of this part; not paid by the Federal Government under another Federal award except where allowed; provided for in the approved budget when required by the Federal awarding agency; and conform to other provisions of this part, as applicable. 2 CFR 200.318(i), regarding general procurement standards, requires Non-Federal entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.329, concerning monitoring and reporting program performance, states that the non-Federal entity is responsible for oversight of the operations of the Federal award supported activities. The non-Federal entity must monitor its activities under Federal awards to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved. Monitoring by the non-Federal entity must cover each program, function, or activity. We recommend the Knott County Fiscal Court implement adequate internal controls to ensure federal compliance requirements are met. In addition, the fiscal court should maintain documentation for all project activity to effectively track work that is necessary and to determine the portion eligible for coverage under Federal programs.

Corrective Action Plan

Prepared by: Kevin Jacobs Date Prepared: 7-3-24 Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Kevin Jacobs Jeff Dobson Anticipated Completion Date: 7-3-24 Official's Response: To be clear the documents had to be presented to FEMA to get reimbursement, this was done. The Fiscal Court will endeavor to make sure the FEMA files are updated and complete after FEMA reimbursement.

Categories

Questioned Costs Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1137715 2023-003
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $7.80M
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $326,373
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $199,000
93.045 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part C_nutrition Services $97,734
15.260 Joint Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Economic Development Pilot $51,159
21.032 Local Assistance & Tribal Consistency Fund $50,000
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $18,190
93.053 Nutrition Services Incentive Program $17,738