Finding 551120 (2024-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-31

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: SAFE lacks proper documentation for transaction approvals, with 16 out of 20 transactions missing this essential paperwork.
  • Impacted Requirements: This deficiency violates SAFE's policy for expenditure approvals, risking non-compliance with grant requirements.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a robust system to ensure all transactions are thoroughly reviewed and documented for approval.

Finding Text

2024-001 Expense Approval Documentation – Significant Deficiency Criteria: Expenditures should be approved by a responsible official of SAFE who is aware of the various compliance requirements under the respective grant, this approval should be documented. Condition: During our testing, we tested 20 transactions and found that 16 did not contain documentation of approval. Cause: Undetermined. Effect: SAFE did not follow their policy for approval of transactions, which allows for the possibility of having purchased items that do not conform to grant requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that SAFE develops a more comprehensive system to ensure that all transactions are properly reviewed and approved.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: SECTION III – Federal Awards Findings: 2024-001 Expense Approval Documentation – Significant Deficiency During the audit performed by Carver, Florek and James, CPA’s, there was a finding related to expense approval documentation. A total of 20 transactions related to SAFE’s building construction project were tested and 16 did not contain certain documentation of approval. Cause: During the pre-construction phase, SAFE’s Board of Directors accepted a construction bid from Quality Construction for the purposes of expanding SAFE’s emergency shelter facility. The Board of Directors authorized the total amount of the contract for construction and for architectural services, to include project management. Architectural services and project management were provided by MMW Architects. The Board further authorized Stacey Umhey and Heidi Pederson to approve all invoices related to the project. In their role as project managers, Architects from MMW Architects approved all construction invoices for costs incurred prior to forwarding those invoices to SAFE. Ms. Umhey and Ms. Pederson relied on this approval for costs of the project and considered this approval by the architects to be in compliance with SAFE’s policy. Corrective Action: All future invoices will be approved by the authorized SAFE staff person, even in instances where there is project manager approval. This corrective action will be put in place immediately and will continue into the future.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1127562 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $921,247
16.736 Transitional Housing Assistance for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Stalking, Or Sexual Assault $143,843
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $131,603
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $120,763
16.589 Rural Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking Assistance Program $106,710
93.497 Family Violence Prevention and Services/ Sexual Assault/rape Crisis Services and Supports $31,366
93.671 Family Violence Prevention and Services/domestic Violence Shelter and Supportive Services $9,976
97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program $8,027