Finding 547477 (2024-004)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-31
Audit: 351666
Organization: Wellspace Health (CA)
Auditor: Moss Adams LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Patients were incorrectly given sliding fee discounts, leading to a total overstatement of $418 in patient charges.
  • Impacted Requirements: The Organization failed to verify income documentation and apply discounts according to the sliding fee schedule, violating OMB and CFR guidelines.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Strengthen verification processes, conduct monthly audits of sliding fee applications, and provide ongoing training for staff to ensure accurate application of discounts.

Finding Text

Criteria: In accordance with OMB No. 0915-0193, the Uniform Data System (UDS) report is required to be submitted for the Health Centers Cluster program annually on a calendar year basis. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such Guidelines. Condition: The Organization determines the amount of fees to be charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size in conjunction with the sliding fee schedule. During our testing of sliding fee discount, we noted the following:  One (1) out of 60 patients selected was given a sliding fee discount when the patient did not qualify for any discount under the program, resulting in overstatement of the sliding fee discount by $289.  One (1) out of 60 selections were given a discount, however, the Organization did not retain physical support for proof of income for the verification of the eligibility and appropriate sliding fee scale, resulting in a possible overstatement of the sliding fee discount by $129. Context: The audit findings represent a systematic problem, see condition above. Questioned Costs: $418 of the $8,533 patient charges sampled. Effect: Patients were improperly categorized on the Organization’s sliding fee scale and were given an improper sliding fee discount. Cause: The inaccuracies in the application of the sliding fee program discounts were due to human error and inadequate oversight and review. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization’s procedures be strengthened to ensure 1) income is properly verified and adequately documented, and 2) the sliding fee discount is properly determined and applied. The Organization should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Organization’s policies are consistently and properly applied. Repeat finding: This is a similar repeat finding to last year’s audit #2023-002. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Organization will strengthen procedures to ensure discounts for sliding fee is applied consistently and accurately. Immediately, the Organization will conduct monthly application audits. An audit of 25 sliding fee application forms completed in the month prior will be examined for accuracy, along with their supporting data. All information from these applications will be cross-verified in NextGen. The results from the sliding fee monthly audits will be monitored and reported quarterly at the Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement meetings. The Organization will be implementing a workflow adjustment stating all Slide applications will be noted in the system with a 30-day expiration deadline. This will ensure the staff will be able to notify the patient they would need to begin the process over and present the supporting documentation. Once the documentation is received the timeframe will extend to one year. Furthermore, the Organization will continue the practice of conducting skills assessments at the start of the year and once more in July. These assessments are crucial as they help pinpoint staff members who might benefit from refresher training. Moreover, a meeting has been scheduled to finalize the days and times for virtual sliding fee application training. This training, aimed at all staff who handle a sliding fee form, will be spread out over four weeks, with one session per week lasting an hour. Additionally, the Organization will introduce a sliding fee training video to the new employee orientation. After completing their NextGen training, staff will receive this training video via email. Furthermore, this video will also be sent to all health center leadership to be utilized at the health center level.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan: The organization will continue with its ongoing implementation of several measures to ensure accuracy and compliance in the sliding fee process. Monthly audits will continue to be conducted to review all sliding fee application forms from the previous month for accuracy and verifying information in NextGen. Skills assessments will continue to be conducted in January and July to identify staff needing refresher training. A sliding fee wage training video has been added to Relias and will be required for all staff involved in the process, providing guidance on wage calculation. This training will be distributed twice a year. Additionally, sliding fee monthly audit results will be reported quarterly at QA/QI meetings. To enhance accountability, the organization has implemented an expiration policy for applications lacking supporting documentation within 30 days. The system will automatically expire these applications on day 31, prompting staff to have the patient reapply. Patients who fail to provide the required documentation within the timeframe will receive an invoice or statement for all services rendered during the 30-day period. Estimated completion date: September 30, 2025 Contact person: Shannon Potter, Deputy Chief of Business Service

Categories

Questioned Costs Subrecipient Monitoring Eligibility Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 547478 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 547479 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 547480 2024-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1123919 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1123920 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1123921 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1123922 2024-005
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $4.75M
93.224 Health Center Program (community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) $4.45M
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $1.52M
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance $1.46M
93.696 Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grants $1.08M
93.977 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (std) Prevention and Control Grants $273,866
93.526 Grants for Capital Development in Health Centers $238,417
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $194,150
93.527 Grants for New and Expanded Services Under the Health Center Program $59,664
93.596 Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the Child Care and Development Fund $34,057