Finding 537639 (2024-004)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-27
Audit: 348917
Auditor: Smco

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Two utility allowances were calculated incorrectly, violating federal regulations.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with the 2014 Appropriations Act and HUD regulations regarding utility allowances for families, especially those with disabilities.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should establish procedures to ensure accurate utility allowance calculations and compliance with regulations in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program.

Finding Text

Program Name Housing Choice Voucher Internal Control Significant Deficiency N Special Test and Provisions ALN 14.871 2023-004 Utilities Allowance Calcuation Questioned Costs None Criteria "In accordance with the 2014 Appropriations Act Section 242, the utility allowance for a family shall be the lower of: (1) The utility allowance amount for the family unit size; or (2) the utility allowance amount for the unit size of the unit rented by the family. However, upon the request of a family that includes a person with disabilities, the PHA must approve a utility allowance higher than the applicable amount if such a higher utility allowance is needed as a reasonable accommodation in accordance with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 8 to make the program accessible to and usable by the family member with a disability. This provision applies only to vouchers issued after the effective date of this notice (June 12, 2014) and to current program participants. For current program participants, a PHA must implement the new allowance at the family's next annual reexamination, provided that the PHA is able to provide a family with at least 60 days' notice prior to the reexamination. " Condition During the audit, we noted two (2) HUD Forms 50058 had utility allowances calculated not in accordance with the above criteria. Context The Authority had roughly 120 vouchers issued throughout the fiscal year under examination which would translate to 1,400 housing assistance payment transactions for the year. Of these we reviewed 40 individual housing assistance payment transactions, and found 2 instances of noncompliance. Cause Personnel responsible for calculating the utility allowances were not informed of requirements and no internal controls were in place to ensure compliance. Effect The Authority was in violation of the Federal Regulation which resulted in errors in calculating housing assistance payments (HAP) and utility reimbursement payments. Recommendations We recommend that Management implement procedures to ensure compliance with the above regulations as it relates to the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. Management Views Management agrees with the finding, see management's corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

In accordance with the 2014 Appropriations Act Section 242, the utility allowance for a family shall be the lower of: (1) the utility allowance amount for the family unit size; or (2) the utility allowance amount for the unit size of the unit rented by the family. However, upon the request of a family that includes a person with disabilities, the PHA must approve a utility allowance higher than the applicable amount if such a higher utility allowance is needed as a reasonable accommodation in accordance with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 8 to make the program accessible to and usable by the family member with a disability. This provision applies only to vouchers issued after the effective date of this notice (June 12, 2014) and to current program participants. For current program participants, a PHA must implement the new allowance at the family's next annual reexamination, provided that the PHA is able to provide a family with at least 60 days' notice prior to the reexamination. During the audit, we noted two (2) HUD Forms 50058 had utility allowances calculated not in accordance with the above criteria. The Authority had roughly 120 vouchers issued throughout the fiscal year under examination which would translate to 1,400 Housing Assistance Payment transactions for the year. Of these we reviewed 40 individual Housing Assistance Payment transactions and found 2 instances of noncompliance. Recommendation We recommend that Management implement procedures to ensure compliance with the above regulations as it relates to the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. Corrective Action Plan File audits are being done quarterly beyond regularly quality control audits. Staff are required to do additional annual compliance training to ensure procedures are being followed.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Cash Management Significant Deficiency Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 537638 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1114080 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1114081 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $10.23M
14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund $990,165
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $626,127
21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program $463,552
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $357,861
14.238 Shelter Plus Care $210,151
14.249 Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy $1,385