Finding 529177 (2024-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-20

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The University failed to report graduation statuses for some students in the NSLDS, which is crucial for accurate enrollment reporting.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations for timely and accurate enrollment data reporting, particularly for Campus and Program Level Records.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Enhance policies to ensure all student status changes are reported promptly, especially after resolving errors from rejected NSLDS records.

Finding Text

2024 002 Special Tests and Provisions (Enrollment Reporting) Student Financial Assistance Cluster: U.S. Department of Education Federal Pell Grant Program (ALN 84.063) Federal Direct Student Loans (ALN 84.268) Federal Grant Numbers: E-P063P243920 (7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024), P268K253920 (7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024) Statistically Valid Sample: No, and it was not intended to be Prior Year Finding: Not a repeat finding. Finding Type: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria: Under the Pell grant and the Direct and Federal Family Education Loan programs, institutions are required to report enrollment information via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) (OMB No. 1845 0035). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update and certify student enrollment statuses, program information and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. The data on the institution’s Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS has as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information; “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Campus Level Record data elements. The Department of Education (ED) considers the following data elements to be high risk: • OPEID number, enrollment effective date, enrollment status and certification date Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Program Level Record data elements. The Department of Education (ED) considers the following data elements to be high risk: • OPEID number, CIP code, CIP year, credential level, published program length measurement, published program length, program begin date, program enrollment status and program enrollment effective date Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third party servicer. Institutions must complete and return within 15 days the Enrollment Reporting roster file placed in their Student Aid Internet Gateway (SAIG) (OMB No. 1845 0002) mailboxes sent by ED via NSLDS. An institution determines how often it receives the Enrollment Reporting roster file with the default set at a minimum of every 60 days. Once received, the institution must update for changes in the data elements for the Campus Record and the Program Record identified above, and submit the changes electronically through the batch method, spreadsheet submittal, or the NSLDS website (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309: Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). Additionally, in accordance with federal requirements, the University shall maintain internal controls over federal programs designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are executed in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award that could have a direct and material effect on a federal program. Condition and Context: The University utilizes the National Student Clearinghouse (the Clearinghouse) as a service provider for transmissions of its enrollment reporting changes to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). The University receives the Enrollment Reporting Roster and updates it for changes in student status. The file is sent to the Clearinghouse who transmits the updated information to NSLDS. For five of forty students selected for testwork, the University did not report the student’s status as graduated within the Campus-Level Record or Program-Level Record. The University did properly report the student was withdrawn prior to determining if the student met the requirements for graduation and updating NSLDS to reflect that determination. For one of forty students selected for testwork, the University did not report the student’s status as graduated within the Program-Level Record. The graduation status was properly reported in the Campus-Level Record. The University did properly report the student was withdrawn prior to determining if the student met the requirements for graduation and updating NSLDS to reflect that determination. Cause: The submission of certain student records was rejected by NSLDS in Summer 2024. Due to the volume of records rejected, the University needed time to resolve all errors and resubmit the rosters. During this process, the submission of the graduation information for the above individuals was missed. The management review control over the submission of the enrollment roster file did not operate at a precise enough level to identify the missing graduation information. Effect: Student status changes not reported in a timely manner could cause the student to not enter into repayment status on a timely basis. However, in this case, the student’s’ timely reported withdrawn status did cause the student to enter repayment status on a timely basis. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the University enhance its current policies and procedures to ensure that when there are error codes generated from rejected NSLDS records that all student status changes are properly and timely reported to NSLDS when determined. Views of Responsible Officials: The University agrees with this finding. It is important to note that all six students were correctly reported with withdrawn status timely, and there was no delay of the students going into repayment status timely. The University has communicated extensively with the Clearinghouse about these six errors which are related to Error Code 75. The Clearinghouse has been working with NSLDS about the issues in these particular cases as they are not only related to the University. It is the University’s understanding that the errors were caused by a technical issue with the NSLDS system modernization and were out of the University’s ability to remedy. The University believes that the issue causing these errors is resolved and continues to monitor NSLDS’ error reports on the Student Status Confirmation Reports (SSCR) to ensure we are aware if they return. The University will continue to submit the SSCR responses to the Clearinghouse and ensure we report individual graduations or enrollment if there are error codes that cannot be resolved timely through the Clearinghouse process.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-002 Special Tests (Enrollment Reporting) Federal Agency: Student Financial Assistance Cluster - U.S. Department of Education Program Titles and ALN: Federal Pell Grant Program (ALN 84.063) and Federal Direct Student Loans (ALN 84.268) Federal Grant Numbers: E-P063P243920 (7/1/2024 – 6/30/2025), P268K253920 (7/1/2024 – 6/30/2025) Contact Person: Catharine A. Punchello, Vice Provost and University Registrar, 609-984-1180, x3135 Corrective Action: National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) has resolved the issue causing the Error Code 75 (EC75) errors. Our last large batch of 75 errors was received in response to our Student Status Confirmation Report (SSCR) on July 8, 2024. We received one EC75 on September 13, 2024 and two EC75 on November 8, 2024 and none since then. The University continues to monitor NSLDS’ error reports on our SSCRs to ensure we are aware if they return. The University will continue to submit the SSCR responses to the Clearinghouse and ensure we report individual graduations or enrollment if there are error codes that cannot be resolved timely through the Clearinghouse process. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed

Categories

Student Financial Aid Special Tests & Provisions Reporting Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 529175 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 529176 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 529178 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1105617 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1105618 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1105619 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1105620 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $12.02M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $5.22M
45.310 Grants to States $4.50M
21.029 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund $226,235
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $202,568
17.268 H-1b Job Training Grants $193,382
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $109,810
77.008 U.s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Scholarship and Fellowship Program $97,361
32.011 Affordable Connectivity Outreach Grant Program $80,885
93.264 Nurse Faculty Loan Program (nflp) $61,481
89.003 National Historical Publications and Records Grants $45,550
64.028 Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance $19,344
81.121 Nuclear Energy Research, Development and Demonstration $13,434
45.162 Promotion of the Humanities Teaching and Learning Resources and Curriculum Development $7,600
45.312 National Leadership Grants $124