Finding 526870 (2024-003)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-13

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Museum lacks proper documentation for procurement processes, failing to meet federal requirements.
  • Impacted Requirements: Internal controls and procurement standards under 2 CFR §200.303 and §200.318 are not adequately followed.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Ensure all procurement records clearly document the rationale for methods, contractor selections, and pricing to comply with federal guidelines.

Finding Text

Finding 2024-003: Procurement (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: 45.301 - Institute of Museum and Library Services Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate Dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined that while the Museum does have an established procurement policy in place, the Museum did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Museum's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: We noted that items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Museum retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials: We have already taken several steps to address this issue and to ensure that similar situations do not occur in the future: 1. Policy Review and Reinforcement: We have conducted a detailed review of the procurement policy to ensure that all relevant employees know its requirements and the importance of compliance. We are also revising our internal communication to ensure everyone involved in procurement knows the steps and documentation required. 2. Training and Awareness: To prevent future non-compliance, we are scheduling mandatory training sessions for all personnel involved in procurement activities. This will help ensure that all team members fully understand the policy and know how to apply it correctly.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 526869 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 526871 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1103311 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1103312 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1103313 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
45.130 Promotion of the Humanities Challenge Grants $635,000
45.301 Museums for America $280,412
45.164 Promotion of the Humanities Public Programs $193,192