Finding 526862 (2024-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-03-13
Audit: 345962
Organization: King's College (PA)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: A student did not receive the correct Federal Pell Grant amount due to a failure to update their award package after a decrease in Expected Family Contribution (EFC) following verification.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations requiring accurate Pell Grant disbursements based on updated EFCs and effective internal controls.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement an additional step in verification procedures to ensure Pell Grant awards are adjusted for any changes in EFC after verification is completed.

Finding Text

Finding 2024-001: Eligibility-Pell Grant (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program - Federal Pell Grant Program Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable ALN - 84.063 Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The amount of a student's Pell Grant for an academic year is based upon the payment and disbursement schedules published by the Secretary for each award year (34 CFR 690.62) The Code of Federal Regulations (34 CFR 690.80(b)(1)) states if the student's enrollment status changes from one academic term to another within the same award year, the institution shall recalculate the Federal Pell Grant award for the new payment period taking into account any changes in the cost of attendance. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure students are awarded and disbursed the proper federal fund amounts. Condition/Context: For one student out of 40 tested, the student was selected for, and completed, verification prior to the College disbursing funds for the Fall 2023 term. As a result of that verification, the student's Expected Family Contribution (EFC) decreased and the College received a valid, corrected ISIR. However, the student's award package was not updated as a result of the decreased EFC. The sample was not a statistically valid sample but was determined using Chapter 21 - Audit Sampling Considerations of Uniform Guidance Compliance Audits of the Government Auditing Standards and Single Audit Guide. Cause: A corrected ISIR came in after verification was complete and the review and re-packaging process never occurred. Effect: The student was not awarded the appropriate amount of Federal Pell Grant funds based on the student's lower, corrected EFC. Questioned Costs: $400 Recommendation: We recommend that a step is added to the College's standard verification procedures to ensure that Federal Pell Grant awards are appropriately adjusted for any changes in EFC that are the result of a completed verification. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The College agrees with the finding. A corrected ISIR came in after verification was complete and instead of going through the normal process of being reviewed and repackaged by the director, the student record was accidentally filed away. This happened due to human error. We have a process in place to monitor corrected ISIR transactions to ensure that the EFC (SAI effective for award year 2024-25 and later) agrees with our documentation. The student record is then given to the director for final review and repackaging. We have added an additional step now whereby the Pell Grant administrator also reviews the output report for ISIR imports on a weekly basis.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The College agrees with the finding. A corrected ISIR came in after verification was complete and instead of going through the normal process of being reviewed and repackaged by the director, the student record was accidentally filed away. This happened due to human error. We have a process in place to monitor corrected ISIR transactions to ensure that the EFC (SAI effective for award year 2024-25 and later) agrees with our documentation. The student record is then given to the director for final review and repackaging. We have added an additional step now whereby the Pell Grant administrator also reviews the output report for ISIR imports on a weekly basis.

Categories

Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Subrecipient Monitoring Eligibility Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 526863 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 526864 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1103304 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1103305 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1103306 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $15.22M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $2.80M
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $1.20M
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $313,788
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $252,017
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $199,221
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (teach Grants) $26,404