Finding 516371 (2024-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2024-12-20
Audit: 334325
Organization: Clatsop Community College (OR)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Two students were over awarded Pell Grants due to incorrect rounding in the software used for calculating disbursements.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations on Pell Grant disbursement and internal controls for federal awards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Review the new system's auto-packaging rounding rules to ensure alignment with federal guidelines.

Finding Text

Criteria or specific requirement: The amount of a student's Pell Grant for an academic year is based upon the payment and disbursement schedules published by the Secretary for each award year (34 CFR 690.62). The Code of Federal Regulations (34 CFR 690.80(b)(1)) states if the student’s enrollment status changes from one academic term to another within the same award year, the institution shall recalculate the Federal Pell Grant award for the new payment period taking into account any changes in the cost of attendance. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure students are awarded and disbursed the proper federal fund amounts. Condition: During our eligibility testing, we identified that 2 out of 38 students who received Pell grants were over awarded and overpaid. The explanation provided indicated that the system packages Pell awards based on the annual award, divides it to calculate per-term disbursements, and then rounds the amounts up or down. CLA recalculated the awards using the annual award and found that the system was incorrectly rounding up, resulting in the over awards. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our eligibility testing of thirty-eight students who received Pell, we noted two students that were over awarded and overpaid in Pell grants. Cause: The software that is used to auto package Pell awards has rounding rules inconsistent with that of the rules outlined in the Federal Student Aid handbook and was rounding amounts up when then it should have been rounded down. Effect: A student received more aid than they were eligible for. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The College changed systems since the end of this fiscal year, and we recommend the College review the auto-packaging rounding rules of its new system to ensure that the Pell award is calculated in accordance with federal regulations. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.063 Recommendation: The College changed systems since the end of this fiscal year, and we recommend the College review the auto-packaging rounding rules of its new system to ensure that the Pell award is calculated in accordance with federal regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have implemented the auditor’s recommendation and thoroughly tested award rounding in the new SIS. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sarah Geleynse Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implemented September 2024

Categories

Student Financial Aid Eligibility Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 516372 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 516373 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 516374 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 516375 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 516376 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 516377 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 516378 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 516379 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 516380 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 516381 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 516382 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 516383 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 516384 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 516385 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 516386 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 516387 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 516388 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1092813 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1092814 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1092815 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1092816 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1092817 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1092818 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1092819 2024-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1092820 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092821 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092822 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092823 2024-004
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092824 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092825 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092826 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092827 2024-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1092828 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1092829 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1092830 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $1.16M
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $469,816
84.044 Trio—talent Search $378,332
84.047 Trio—upward Bound $361,025
84.042 Trio--Student Support Services $350,960
84.048 Career and Technical Education—basic Grants to States $267,573
84.002 Adult Education—basic Grants to States $185,324
21.027 Covid-19 Coronavirus State & Local Recovery Funds $129,709
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $106,461
84.425 Covid-19 Arp Esser---Ccl Navigator $104,281
59.037 Small Business Development Centers $93,084
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $92,209