Finding 516362 (2024-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2024-12-20

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: One student was over awarded by $16,700 due to inadequate controls in budget adjustments.
  • Impacted Requirements: Awards must align with students' financial need, as per federal regulations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Improve internal controls and document procedures for budget adjustments in a formal policy.

Finding Text

Criteria: Awards must be coordinated among the various programs and with other federal and nonfederal aid (need and non-need based aid) to ensure that total aid is not awarded in excess of the student’s financial need (34 CFR § 668.42 FWS and 34 CFR § 682.301). Per 34 CFR § 685.200, a Direct Subsidized Loan borrower must demonstrate financial need in accordance with Title IV, Part F of the Higher Education Act of 1965. Upon packaging a student’s aid, schools are required to calculate the student’s need based on the expected family contribution, estimated financial assistance, and estimated cost of attendance. Condition/context: A sample of 25 students out of a population of 573 students who received disbursements of student financial assistance federal awards was selected. The financial need was calculated for each student, with the student’s estimated financial assistance also deducted. One student was identified as being over awarded by $16,700. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Questioned costs: Less than the questioned cost threshold of $25,000. Cause/Effect: This occurred because of a lack of properly documented control procedures surrounding the recording and review of budget adjustments. The student received multiple adjustments to their cost of attendance and award due to changes in enrollment status. One student was over awarded by $16,700. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University continue to focus on improving internal controls surrounding the calculation and posting of, as well as review of, budget adjustments. We recommend further that the University ensure this process is well documented in a formal policy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding as presented. Corrective action taken is as follows: Management has completed a review and refinement of steps already in place, specifically addressing the processing of budgets for students who are off-cycle during a semester. Management has drafted a quality control process document to address the deficiency.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: The auditors recommend the University continue to focus on improving internal controls surrounding the calculation and posting of, as well as review of, budget adjustments. The auditors recommend further that the University ensure this process is well documented in a formal policy. Action taken: Identified common causation factors that contributed to the finding. In this particular case, the student’s budget was adjusted more than once due to changes in both her graduation date and her tuition rate during her final year. Her budget was not adjusted correctly. The issues identified are: o Identifying when tuition charge has been adjusted. o Having another financial aid staff member review changes to the budget adjustment(s). The following actions were taken: o Reached out for assistance identifying students whose tuition has been reduced. Was provided with a report we can run before financial aid disburses, “FA Registration”, which will capture all changes to each student’s tuition. o Have included running this report in the steps completed prior to aid disbursement. o Reviewed and refined steps already in place, specifically addressing the processing of budgets for students who are off cycle during a semester. Steps are outlined in document “23-24 Budget Adjustment Quality Control Process” and include:  Templates to be used for correct budgets.  Assigned two-letter comment codes that will identify students with budget adjustment for off-cycle attendance.  Created a selection set in PowerFAIDS to capture students with these comment codes in a report.  Created a task in PowerFAIDS that will assign review of completed budget adjustments to a specific FA staff member. She will review the calculations and sign off on them. These actions have been implemented effective immediately. Name of Responsible Party: Laura Pendleton, Director of Financial Aid Anticipated completion date: October 30, 2024

Categories

Questioned Costs Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Student Financial Aid

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1092804 2024-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $43.64M
93.884 Grants for Primary Care Training and Enhancement $165,559
93.837 Cardiovascular Diseases Research $57,287
93.866 Aging Research $24,674
93.393 Cancer Cause and Prevention Research $18,267