Finding 514430 (2024-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2024
Accepted
2024-12-16
Audit: 332752
Auditor: Smco

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The PHA failed to enforce rent abatements for three units that did not meet Housing Quality Standards (HQS) for several months.
  • Impacted Requirements: The PHA must conduct bi-annual inspections and enforce timely corrections for HQS deficiencies, including rent abatement if issues are not resolved.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The PHA should enhance oversight to ensure compliance with federal regulations and enforce rent abatements when necessary.

Finding Text

2024-002 Housing Quality Standards Inspection/HQS Enforcement Questioned Costs None Criteria The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)). Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). Condition During our audit, we identified three (3) failed HQS that did not receive a pass for several months and no rent abetment process was started or enforced during that time period. Context The HQS population was 1,100 failed inspection. We selected a sample of 40 inspection and identified of those 40 reviewed 3 did not obtain a re-inspection pass within the Criteria noted above and no rent abetment process was enforce on landlord. Cause The Authority staff did not want to jeopardize the tenants lease by enforcing the rent abatements and rather worked with the landlord over an extend period to resolve the failed inspection issues. Effect The Authority is non‐compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in operating and financial penalties. Recommendations We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements. Management Views Management agrees with the finding, see Management's corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-002 Corrective Action Plan. Management has implemented additional oversight and control to ensure that failed HQS inspections are followed up properly and timely including, when necessary, rent abatement.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1090872 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.881 Moving to Work Demonstration Program $41.63M
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $5.68M
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $4.38M
14.870 Resident Opportunity and Supportive Services - Service Coordinators $362,439
14.238 Shelter Plus Care $128,458