Finding 512222 (2024-004)

-
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2024-11-26
Audit: 329972
Organization: Texas Wesleyan University (TX)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: A student received financial aid despite not meeting satisfactory academic progress standards, leading to questioned costs of $6,761.
  • Impacted Requirements: Eligibility criteria for federal aid require students to maintain good standing as per federal regulations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The University should enhance controls to prevent aid awards to ineligible students and ensure proper training and processes are in place for staff.

Finding Text

Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants, ALN 84.007; Federal Work-Study Program, ALN 84.033 Federal Pell Grant Program, ALN 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loans, ALN 84.268 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants, ALN 84.379 U.S. Department of Education Program Year 2023-2024 Criteria or specific requirement – Eligibility – Students must maintain good standing, or satisfactory academic progress (34 CFRs 668.16, 668.32(f), 668.34, 690.75, 675.9, 676.9, 685.200, 686.11, 20 USC 1070h; 42 CFR 57.306; 42 USC 293a(d)(2)). Condition – A student was awarded aid who did not meet satisfactory academic progress standards per the University’s policy Questioned costs - $6,761 – ALN 84.268 Context – Out of a population of 1,724 students who received aid, a sample of 25 students was selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. One student received aid who had not met satisfactory academic progress standards per the University’s policy. Effect – Aid was awarded to one student who was not eligible to receive aid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – The University should update their controls to ensure no students receive aid who have not met satisfactory academic progress standards. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – The audit noted one student was awarded financial aid despite not meeting Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) standards. The issue stemmed from a lapse in the SAP review process at the end of the Fall 2023 term, which was primarily attributed to staff turnover and insufficient training for remaining personnel. When the student did not enroll for the Spring term but later registered for the Summer 2024 session, there were no safeguards in place to prevent the system from awarding financial aid. This oversight highlighted a gap in the current process, emphasizing the need for a more robust mechanism to flag students who are not in compliance with SAP prior to awarding financial aid. In the new organizational structure, the Financial Aid Business Analyst is responsible for executing the SAP process. This individual has approximately 10 years of experience working with SAP processes. During the 2023-2024 academic year the University worked diligently to respond to a Federal Program Review from the U.S. Department of Education, (ED). As a result of the corrective actions being undertaken by the University new procedures in many areas were being drafted and implemented. A new Director of Financial Aid, with over 30 years of experience in financial aid, was hired to improve the overall student service and compliance with the Federal Title IV program. The new director commenced his duties on February 1, 2024. Since that time the University has reorganized the financial aid office by creating an Assistant Director and Financial Aid Business Analyst position who have increased the expertise and overall years of financial aid experience. A leadership team including the Director of Financial Aid, Registrar, Director of Student Accounts, Associate Provost, Provost and Vice President for Finance and Administration was created in January 2024 and meet bi-weekly to discuss Title IV compliance topics, process improvement and customer service. Most of the Financial Aid team’s time in the spring and summer was spent working on the new FAFSA, the team has redirected their efforts in training, standardizing, documenting and improving processes to ensure Title IV compliance and better serve students.

Categories

Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Eligibility Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $22.75M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $5.31M
84.047 Trio Upward Bound $1.19M
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $267,642
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $248,000
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $200,000
84.116 Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education $147,848
84.031 Higher Education Institutional Aid $129,504
47.076 Stem Education (formerly Education and Human Resources) $64,793
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $46,914
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (teach Grants) $5,654
45.310 Grants to States $619