Finding 505571 (2024-003)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2024-11-13
Audit: 328266
Organization: Southwest Baptist University (MO)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Two students had incorrect return of Title IV funds calculations, leading to late submissions to the Department of Education.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with Title IV regulations regarding timely return of funds, specifically within 45 days of withdrawal.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a robust review policy for return of funds calculations and ensure accurate communication between departments to prevent future errors.

Finding Text

Federal Agency Program – U.S. Department of Education, Student Financial Assistance Cluster, Federal Pell Grant Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.063; Federal Direct Loan Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.268 Program Year - June 1, 2023 – May 31, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests – Return of Title IV Funds – When a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV aid earned by the student as of the student’s withdrawal date. If the total amount of Title IV assistance earned by the student is less than the amount that was disbursed to the student on his or her behalf as of the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew, the difference must be returned to the Title IV programs as outlined in this section and no additional disbursements may be made to the student for the payment period or period of enrollment (34 CFR Sections 668.22(a)(1)-(3)). Condition – During our testing, we noted two students whose return of funds calculation was incorrect and funds were submitted after the required deadline. Questioned Costs – $1,428 Context – During our testing, it was noted that the University does have a process in place to ensure return of calculations are being performed, but there was a break-down in the communication process during the year. Of a sample of ten return of funds tested from a population of 49 performed during the examination period, two calculations were incorrect and funds were not returned within the required time of 45 days. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Cause – The process of communicating a withdrawal to the party responsible for the refund did not occur timely and incorrect data was used to calculate the return. Effect – The University returned the incorrect amount of funds to the Department of Education. Identification as a Repeat Finding – Yes finding 2023-001 Recommendation – We recommend that the University has a policy in place to review the return of funds calculation and ensure that the calculation is accurate according to the regulations to be diligent in performing secondary reviews to endure the calculations are performed correctly. While testing the return of Title IV funds from a sample, Forvis Mazars noted that two students did not have a refund calculation completed in a timely manner. These findings had been discovered by SBU and corrected, and funds were returned earlier, but they were still outside the compliance timeframe, which required an audit finding. One student didn't inform the University she dropped timely and when that was communicated to the Registrar Office it was not entered in the system correctly and therefore not communicated to the Financial Aid Department. Though late, once it was discovered, she was processed. The other student had the return initially calculated with the assumption she received loans but never accepted them and they were not disbursed, so the refund was calculated incorrectly. It was subsequently corrected at the end of the semester for the proper amount but because of the delay it was late. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The issues identified in the previous audit were identified part way through fiscal year 2023. Corrective actions identified in the prior audit and listed below are in place going forward. To address these issues, SBU employees have taken the following corrective measures: 1. We reworked the reporting process for withdrawals. All withdrawals now go to the Associate Provost regardless of campus or program. They are then processed by the Registrar's Office and placed in a shared drive. Once there, they are reviewed weekly by the Financial Aid Office, and R2T4s are completed in a timely manner. If there are any withdrawals outside of the normal process timeframe they are escalated and the Registrar and Executive Director of Financial Aid are notified. 2. R2T4 requests are completed by one Financial Aid staff member and verified and processed by another to ensure accuracy and reliability. 3. We have implemented an administrative withdrawal process to give campus and program directors the ability and authority to withdraw students who are no longer in attendance to limit the number of all Fs at the end of the semester.

Categories

Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Reporting Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 505568 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 505569 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 505570 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1082010 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1082011 2024-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1082012 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1082013 2024-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $13.84M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $2.95M
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $1.16M
93.364 Nursing Student Loans $768,989
93.264 Nurse Faculty Loan Program (nflp) $449,973
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $254,811
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $164,998