Finding 505560 (2023-005)

Material Weakness
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-11-13

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The School Corporation improperly paid $822,750 in stipends without adequate documentation or justification, violating federal guidelines.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.303 and 200.403 regarding internal controls and allowable costs, risking future federal funding.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish a robust internal control system and develop clear policies to ensure all costs are properly documented and justified.

Finding Text

FINDING 2023-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425V200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context On December 17, 2021, the School Corporation paid all School Corporation employees who had been employed with the School Corporation during the 2020-2021 school year and for 120 days a School Board approved retention bonus. The across-the-board stipends were paid without justification or documentation that provided for additional duties or work performed on which to base the stipends. The total amount of stipends paid, $822,750, were considered questioned costs. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 MICHIGAN CITY AREA SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the stipend payments noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Indiana Department of Education's ESSER II Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) states in part: "12. Can ESSER II funds be used for staff stipends? . . . While across the board stipends are not permitted (as "universal" or "across the board" does not in and of itself demonstrate sufficient documentation), LEAs may pay staff for COVID-related work that has been documented. Most, if not all, staff likely had extra responsibilities as well as time and effort to respond to the pandemic. ESSER funds can be used to pay staff for that work and LEAs are responsible for documenting (with internal controls) that this work occurred. This is consistent with guidance on all salary and stipend payments with all federal funds. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 MICHIGAN CITY AREA SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs were reimbursed that did not have adequate documentation to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $822,750 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response Per the Indiana Department of Education's ESSER II Frequently Asked Questions as stated above in the listed "criteria," across the School Board stipends are not permitted and LEAs may pay staff for COVID-related work that has been documented. We reaffirm our finding and will review the status of the finding during our next audit.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023-005 Finding Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Summary of Finding: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Across-the-board stipends were paid without documentation or justification for additional duties or work performed on which to base the stipends. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Tracey Haas, Deputy Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: thaas@mcas.k12.in.us (219)873-2000 ext. 8346 Views of Responsible Officials: We disagree with this finding. We did not offer an across the board stipend with ESSER II. We paid it to employees who had met certain length of employment requirements and effectiveness requirements. The IDOE guidance states that staff may be paid extra for added COVID-related work. However, this list is not exhaustive and we believe there are other reasons that allowed us to proceed. a. Incentives paid with federal funds must comply with 200.430(f). The federal regulations explicitly state that the bonus is allowed for efficient performance, which was our criteria. Explanation and Reasons for Disagreement: The USDOE gave what we did as a recommended best practice and example for others, of addressing staffing shortages and offering premium pay. In regards to Cafeteria workers please see this research brief released by USDOE regarding pandemic funds (ARP but also other federal pandemic funds, which would include ESSER II) State and Local Practices for Cafeteria and Custodial Staff • Waco Independent School District in Texas will give custodians and cafeteria workers up to $1,000 in bonuses, based on years served with the district. Those who have worked for 10 or more years will receive $1,000, divided in three payments beginning in December 2022. Those who have worked for five to nine years will get $750, and those with the district fewer than five years will get $500. The district expects $500 in bonuses to go to custodians and cafeteria workers. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 46 • North Carolina is using ESSER funds to help local school nutrition operations across􀀃North􀀃Carolina􀀃 recruit􀀃and􀀃retain􀀃needed􀀃staff.􀀃 ESSER states, any activity authorized by the ESEA of 1965 (Titles I, II, III, IV IC Migrant, ID Neglected and Delinquent, 21st Century Community Learning Centers, and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant) is allowable. Title II has explicit language about paying teachers and admin (but not cafeteria) more as a recruitment or retention bonus

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 505557 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 505558 2023-004
    Material Weakness
  • 505559 2023-004
    Material Weakness
  • 505561 2023-005
    Material Weakness
  • 505562 2023-006
    Material Weakness
  • 505563 2023-006
    Material Weakness
  • 505564 2023-007
    Material Weakness
  • 505565 2023-007
    Material Weakness
  • 505566 2023-007
    Material Weakness
  • 505567 2023-007
    Material Weakness
  • 1081999 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 1082000 2023-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1082001 2023-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1082002 2023-005
    Material Weakness
  • 1082003 2023-005
    Material Weakness
  • 1082004 2023-006
    Material Weakness
  • 1082005 2023-006
    Material Weakness
  • 1082006 2023-007
    Material Weakness
  • 1082007 2023-007
    Material Weakness
  • 1082008 2023-007
    Material Weakness
  • 1082009 2023-007
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Fy22 $4.23M
10.555 National School Lunch Program Fy23 $3.62M
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Fy22 $2.92M
10.555 National School Lunch Program Fy22 $2.67M
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Fy23 $2.64M
84.027 Special Education Grants to States Fy22 $1.17M
10.553 School Breakfast Program Fy23 $1.03M
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Fy23 $763,393
10.553 School Breakfast Program Fy22 $760,761
84.287 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers Fy22 $598,438
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children Fy22 $440,960
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Fy22 $418,430
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States Fy22 $390,207
84.287 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers Fy23 $383,036
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States Fy23 $311,509
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program Fy22 $234,632
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States Fy23 $129,156
10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Fy23 $116,903
93.778 Medical Assistance Program Fy22 $113,939
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children Fy23 $108,600
10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Fy22 $96,906
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States Fy22 $91,736
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Fy23 $73,937
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants Fy22 $65,910
93.778 Medical Assistance Program Fy23 $45,121
84.377 School Improvement Grants Fy22 $25,656
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants Fy22 $15,813
10.649 Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs Fy23 $3,135
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants Fy23 $1,180