Finding 50125 (2022-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-07-12

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Invoices for USDA orders lack consistent signatures from recipient agency representatives upon pickup or delivery.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 7 CFR Section 250.19(a) regarding record-keeping for the Emergency Food Assistance Program.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The Food Bank should ensure recipient agencies sign invoices before leaving with goods to maintain proper documentation.

Finding Text

2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pass-Through Entity: State of New York Executive Department of General Services Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.568 , 10.569 Pass-through Grant Numbers: 4NY810809, 4NY100105, 4NY430803, 8NY200100 Program Name: The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), Food Distribution Cluster Criteria: 7 CFR Section 250.19(a) identifies requirements related to record keeping for this major program. It is important to note the Food Bank appeared to maintain the appropriate supporting documents and required components, this finding relates to one component regarding lack of a signoff not lack of documentation. Condition: During our testing, we noted the following: - The invoices created as a result of USDA orders being made were not consistently signed off on by the recipient agency representative upon pick up or delivery of the commodities. Cause: The Food Bank will always try to get these signatures but there are instances where the recipient agency representative will leave without signing. There is no check for the signoff prior to the recipient agency departing with the goods. Effect: The Food Bank does not have consistent documentation, via a signoff, that goods noted on the invoice were picked up by the recipient agency. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: We selected 40 USDA orders across all recipient agencies. 10 of which were from the top 5 volume sites in 2022 and 30 picked haphazardly. Of these 40, there were 4 instances where the invoice was missing a signature from the recipient agency. The invoice is generated from the same software used by the Food Bank to track inventory throughout the year and at year end. During our testing of the components of this software, specifically, values, receipts of inventory, distributions of inventory, and year end test counts of inventory, we found these transactions to be properly supported and recorded. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Food Bank should ensure that when the recipient agencies pick up or have orders delivered, they do not leave without the invoice being properly signed off on. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement the recommendations.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Reference Number: 2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture (USDA) Description of Finding: Criteria: 7 CFR Section 250. I 9(a) identifies requirements related to record keeping for this major program. It is important to note the Food Bank appeared to maintain the appropriate supporting documents and required components, this finding relates to one component regarding lack of a signoff not lack of documentation . Condition: During audit testing performed by Mengel , Metzger, Barr & Co, LLP, they noted the following:The invoices created as a result of USDA orders being made were not consistently signed off on by the recipient agency representative upon pick up or delivery of the commodities. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcur rence: The Food Bank agrees with this finding. Corrective Action: The Food Bank has always made an effort to ensure that agencies sign their invoice when their order is picked up. We will reinforce with our staff that this is an absolute requirement and ensure that all orders picked up by agencies, particularly those with USDA prod ucts on their orders, will sign for the order at the time of pick up. Name of Contact Person: Nicholas Pisani, Chief Operating Officer; phone number 518-786-3691 ext 241; email NickP@Regionalfoodbank.net. Projected Completion Date: June 29, 2023.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring Allowable Costs / Cost Principles HUD Housing Programs Equipment & Real Property Management

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 50126 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 50127 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 50128 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 50129 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 50130 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 50131 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 50132 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 50133 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 50134 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626567 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626568 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626569 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626570 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626571 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626572 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626573 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626574 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626575 2022-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 626576 2022-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.569 Emergency Food Assistance Program (food Commodities) $10.78M
10.568 Emergency Food Assistance Program (administrative Costs) $655,279
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $158,886
97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program $95,962