Finding 498776 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-09-26

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The organization improperly allocated fringe benefits, including unallowable severance pay, leading to overcharges on federal grants.
  • Impacted Requirements: This finding violates 2 CFR 200.431 and 2 CFR 200.430(i), which require accurate and allowable cost allocations supported by internal controls.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Enhance internal controls to ensure fringe costs are allowable and accurately reflect actual expenses; conduct monthly reviews of fringe allocation percentages.

Finding Text

Finding 2023-001 – Allocation of Fringe Benefits Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Major Program: AL# 93.104 Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children with Serious Emotional Disturbances (SED) Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs) Criteria: Per guidance: 2CFR 200.431 Compensation—fringe benefits.(i) (1) … Costs of severance pay are allowable only to the extent that in each case, it is required by (i) Law; (ii) Employer-employee agreement; (iii) Established policy that constitutes, in effect, an implied agreement on the non-Federal entity's part; or (iv) Circumstances of the particular employment. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i), payroll costs charged to federal awards must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: The Organization allocates fringe costs to grants based on budget while capturing actual costs in a fringe cost pool. During the audit we found that the fringe cost pool contained severance pay that exceeded the organization policy and thus unallowable. The removal of these costs resulted in the overcharging of fringe benefits to all projects. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management does not have sufficient internal controls to ensure fringe benefits are allowable and that estimated fringe allocations represent with actual costs. Effect: Expenditures that are not properly identified within the accounting system or supported by underlying documentation are at risk of being owed back to the funding source. Recommendation: Management and those charged with governance should consider increasing controls around ensuring costs charged to the fringe pool are allowable under Uniform Guidance cost principles. The fringe allocation percentage for reimbursement should be reviewed and approved to ensure it represents actual direct costs incurred. This review should be documented and performed monthly (quarterly at minimum). Management’s Response: Management’s response to the finding is discussed in the attached Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-001 Finding: Significant deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs) Corrective Action Plan: CARS management has reviewed the audit findings related to unallowable severance costs, as well as the governance of the estimated and applied fringe rate across all projects. It is the opinion of the auditor that projects were overburdened by severance costs that were unallowable due to being in excess of the company’s established policy for calculating severance. However, per guidance at 2 CFR 200.431, as identified in the criteria section of the report verbiage, severance pay is allowable when required by one, or more, of the following: 1. law, 2. employment agreement, 3. established policy that constitutes an implied agreement, and/or 4. circumstances of the particular employment. It is the opinion of CARS management that claimed severance costs are allowable based on two of the four criteria: 1. Circumstances of employment, and 2. An established policy that was, in effect, an agreement with the employees. Our organization had a written severance policy at the time these costs were incurred. Although all claimed severance costs were based on CARS’ current policy, we have accepted the terms of the audit results for the sole purpose of concluding the audit process. CARS does concur that the current written accounting policy needs to be updated to more accurately reflect and summarize the procedures in place. We are continuing to update written policy verbiage to ensure its alignment with the implied policy that had developed as a result of hiring practices across California’s protected classes. As a result of this audit report, CARS will continue to monitor and assess the need for additional procedures and incorporate changes into the indirect rate reporting processes and written policy as necessary. Anticipated Completion Date: CARS will have its severance policy updated by the end of the fourth quarter of 2024. CARS has updated its procedures to review and monitor the fringe rate and ensure all costs allocated to the final projects are allocable, reasonable in amount, and allowable per policy, contract terms, and regulations to include the documentation of the fringe rate review beginning in October 2024. CARS Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Kerrilyn Nakai

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1075218 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
93.104 Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children with Serious Emotional Disturbances (sed) $3.49M
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance $1.10M
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $402,082