Finding Text
FINDING 2023-003
Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listings Number: 21.027
Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was
2022-003.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
17
MIAMI COUNTY
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Condition and Context
The County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing them to claim its total
State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $6,898,567 as revenue loss to use for
government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds to date were expended under the revenue loss
eligible use category. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no
subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give
rise to subrecipient relationships as there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the
revenue loss portion of the award.
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are
required to verify that such contracts and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded
under procurement and non-procurement transactions (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a
certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to
subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements, related
to covered transactions.
Upon inquiry of the County to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and
debarment requirements, the County stated that they did not have policies or procedures in place for
verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred,
or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Ten
covered transactions to six different vendors for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 that
were paid from SLFRF funds were identified. Each transaction was examined to determine whether the
County verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendor prior to payment. The County had not
verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status for any of the ten covered transactions listed below
prior to issuing payment.
Covered Transactions Tested
Description Amount
Tractors and Equipment for Highway Department
(1 transaction, 1 vendor) $ 155,610
Various local contractors for excavating services
(7 transactions, 3 vendors) 291,425
Services on the HVAC for the Courthouse
(1 transaction, 1 vendor) 75,000
Purchase of culverts
(1 transaction, 1 vendor) 29,933
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
18
MIAMI COUNTY
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
31 CFR 19.300 states:
"When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must
verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You
do this by:
(a) Checking the EPLS; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person."
Cause
The County had not implemented an effectively designed system of internal controls for suspension
and debarment. The County did not verify any covered transactions identified in testing that they were not
suspended or debarred prior to entering into the covered transaction.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
County cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs.
Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be
unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions
or the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the County strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all
vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from
participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.