Finding 42629 (2022-001)

Material Weakness
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-02-27

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The College lacks an effective internal control system for managing the return of Title IV funds, leading to incorrect amounts being returned to the Department of Education.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations under 34 CFR 668.22(g) regarding the return of unearned aid was not met, resulting in systemic noncompliance.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should design and implement a robust internal control system to ensure accurate calculations and compliance with Title IV fund return procedures.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-001 Subject: Student Financial Assistance Cluster - Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants, Federal Pell Grant, Federal Direct Student Loans Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.007, 84.063, 84.268 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The College had not designed, nor implemented an effective internal control system to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds compliance requirement. For 2 of 25 (8 percent) return of Title IV funds tested, the amount returned to the Department of Education was incorrect. The College completed an initial return of Title IV funds and properly posted the full amount of aid to be returned to the students' accounts. During an internal review, the College discovered an error in the initial calculation and therefore calculated a new return of Title IV funds. When the subsequent calculation was performed, the College once again posted the total amount of aid to be returned to each student's account. As a result, the College incorrectly returned too much in Title IV funds to the Department of Education in the amounts of $113 and $546 for the first and second errors, respectively. In addition, this caused both students' accounts to reflect a balance due to the College that should not have been owed. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period; however, these were isolated to students for which a corrective calculation for return of Title IV funds was performed. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 34 CFR 668.22(g) states in part: "Return of unearned aid, responsibility of the institution. (1) The institution must return, in the order specified in paragraph (i) of this section, the lesser of ? (i) (ii) Cause The total amount of unearned title IV assistance to be returned as calculated under paragraph (e)(4) of this section; or An amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student, as described in paragraph (e)(3) of this section. . . ." Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured procedures were in place in order to comply with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award in relation to the Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds compliance requirement. The College should have considered the original amount of aid to be returned that had already been posted to each student's account. The College should have posted the additional amount of aid to be returned to the students' accounts based upon the net difference between the original calculation and the corrective calculation performed for each student. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to remain undetected. As a result, the College returned too much in Title IV funds to the Department of Education as outlined in the Condition and Context. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the College's management design and implement a system of internal control related to procedures for calculating the return of Title IV funds to ensure appropriate amounts are returned to the Department of Education and are posted to students' accounts. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response It is the College's responsibility to administer its student financial assistance programs in a manner that both complies with applicable federal regulations and guidelines as well as ensures that, when necessary, the appropriate amount of unearned financial assistance is returned to the Title IV programs. 34 CFR 668.22(g) states in part: "Return of unearned aid, responsibility of the institution. (1) The institution must return, in the order specified in paragraph (i) of this section, the lesser of ? (i) (ii) Cause The total amount of unearned title IV assistance to be returned as calculated under paragraph (e)(4) of this section; or An amount equal to the total institutional charges incurred by the student for the payment period or period of enrollment multiplied by the percentage of title IV grant or loan assistance that has not been earned by the student, as described in paragraph (e)(3) of this section. . . ." Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured procedures were in place in order to comply with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award in relation to the Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds compliance requirement. The College should have considered the original amount of aid to be returned that had already been posted to each student's account. The College should have posted the additional amount of aid to be returned to the students' accounts based upon the net difference between the original calculation and the corrective calculation performed for each student. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to remain undetected. As a result, the College returned too much in Title IV funds to the Department of Education as outlined in the Condition and Context. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the College's management design and implement a system of internal control related to procedures for calculating the return of Title IV funds to ensure appropriate amounts are returned to the Department of Education and are posted to students' accounts. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response It is the College's responsibility to administer its student financial assistance programs in a manner that both complies with applicable federal regulations and guidelines as well as ensures that, when necessary, the appropriate amount of unearned financial assistance is returned to the Title IV programs.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-001 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Colby Shank Contact Phone Number: 317-921-4765 Views of Responsible Official: Ivy Tech Community College disputes this audit finding. The College has an effective internal control system to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Tests and Provisions ? Return of Title IV Funds compliance requirement. The College previously determined that the Return of Title IV Funds (R2T4) is high-risk due to the large number of transactions, the College?s modular term-based system, and the manual nature of R2T4 calculations. Therefore, a robust quality control review process was implemented. College personnel regularly monitor the error rates and nature of errors discovered through the quality control review to identify, correct, and eliminate calculation errors. The claimed errors outlined in Finding 2022-001 relate to the interpretation of how a correction recalculation is determined. In correction calculations, aid previously returned as a result of the initial calculation in the 2021-2022 academic year was considered no longer disbursed and was included in the correction calculation as ?aid that could have been disbursed.? In certain scenarios, this can result in different return amounts than if the aid had been included in the calculation as ?aid disbursed.? In the absence of explicit guidance on how to handle these scenarios within the Federal Student Aid Handbook, College interpretation and precedent has been to treat aid previously returned under the original calculation as aid that could have been disbursed. Volume 5, Chapter 2 of the 2021-2022 Federal Student Aid Handbook states that ?any undisbursed Title IV aid for the period that the school uses as the basis for the R2T4 calculation is counted as aid that could have been disbursed.? Ivy Tech confirmed this interpretation as valid via a third-party financial aid expert who facilitated a discussion with a representative of the USDOE. This USDOE representative confirmed the accuracy of the calculation and the alignment with the Federal Student Aid Policy Implementation and Oversight Directorate. During this discussion, the representative stated that the results of the original calculation could not be ignored, and that including aid that is no longer disbursed as ?aid that could have been disbursed? is the proper way to perform a correction calculation. The auditors state the College should have performed the following actions: ?The College should have considered the original amount of aid to be returned that had already been posted to each student?s account. The College should have posted the additional amount of aid to be returned to the students? accounts based upon the net difference between the original calculation and the corrective calculation performed for each student.? This methodology would have produced inaccurate return amounts under the interpretation of guidance from Federal Student Aid from which the College was operating during the review period. Only posting the ?net difference? between the original calculation and the correction calculation would have resulted in too few funds being returned to Federal Student Aid for many calculations during the review period. Specifically, a difference in return amounts occurred when the amount of unearned charges (institutional charges for the period multiplied by the percentage of unearned Title IV aid) was less than the calculated amount of Title IV aid to be returned. Under the R2T4 calculation formula, the amount of unearned charges can effectively create a ?cap? on the amount of Title IV aid to be returned by the school. At Ivy Tech Community College, this cap is most often reached when students receive disbursements of federal student loans prior to withdrawing. Because a relatively small percentage of Ivy Tech students receive federal student loans, most correction calculations performed during the review period by Ivy Tech under our interpretation of the guidance resulted in accurate return amounts. This issue only impacted a subset of students who received a correction calculation during the review period. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Upon receiving new guidance from the Chicago/Denver regional office of Federal Student Aid, Ivy Tech has modified the way in which it performs R2T4 correction calculations. Aid returned as a result of the original calculation will remain in the correction calculation as ?aid disbursed? instead of ?aid that could have been disbursed.? The College is no longer following prior guidance received by an expert consultant, a representative of Federal Student Aid that advised the College to include aid that has already been returned as ?aid that could have been disbursed.? The calculation change will be monitored for correctness through the College?s previously established internal controls and quality assurance process for the R2T4 process. Financial aid staff have been trained on the calculation change. Ivy Tech will review all students during the review period who received a correction calculation and will cover with institutional aid any federal grant aid that otherwise would not have been returned under the new guidance from Federal Student Aid. Anticipated Completion Date: 3/31/2023

Categories

Student Financial Aid Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Special Tests & Provisions Material Weakness

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 42630 2022-001
    Material Weakness
  • 42631 2022-001
    Material Weakness
  • 619071 2022-001
    Material Weakness
  • 619072 2022-001
    Material Weakness
  • 619073 2022-001
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $82.33M
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $33.78M
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $5.09M
21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund $1.96M
12.905 Cybersecurity Core Curriculum $697,496
84.044 Trio_talent Search $562,529
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $376,346
17.207 Employment Service/wagner-Peyser Funded Activities $296,071
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $294,301
84.042 Trio_student Support Services $287,725
84.047 Trio_upward Bound $263,116
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $257,726
17.285 Apprenticeship USA Grants $189,377
93.142 Niehs Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training $147,283
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States $95,621
17.268 H-1b Job Training Grants $90,715
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $82,809
19.040 Public Diplomacy Programs $75,190
59.037 Small Business Development Centers $70,059
93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services $68,495
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $66,085
93.421 Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services Through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nations Health $65,834
20.235 Commercial Motor Vehicle Operator Safety Training Grants $46,194
84.016 Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language Programs $26,728
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $25,078
84.031 Higher Education_institutional Aid $16,109
10.902 Soil and Water Conservation $15,766
84.116 Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education $12,791
84.334 Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs $6,270
47.076 Education and Human Resources $5,979
45.129 Promotion of the Humanities_federal/state Partnership $3,207
11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance $1,743
84.220 Centers for International Business Education $1,296
84.015 National Resource Centers Program for Foreign Language and Area Studies Or Foreign Language and International Studies Program and Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellowship Program $847
84.305 Education Research, Development and Dissemination $390