Finding 402446 (2023-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-06-26

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Inadequate documentation and checks for vendor suspension and debarment during procurement processes.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with federal procurement standards and suspension/debarment regulations as outlined in §200.318 and §180.300.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish and train staff on written procurement policies to ensure compliance with federal guidelines and maintain proper documentation.

Finding Text

III ‐ Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Award Program Finding No. 2023‐002 National Science Foundation ‐ Research and Development Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #47.070 ‐ Compliance Requirement Code: I‐Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria In accordance with §200.318(a), General Procurement Standards, a non‐federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified in General Procurement Standards. Additionally, §200.318(i) states that the non‐federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. In addition, in accordance with §200.213 and §180.300, non‐federal entities cannot enter into awards, subawards, or contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition For the procurement samples tested, Management did not provide adequate supporting documentation for the procurement including ensuring proper suspension and debarment checks were performed. Cause The Organization did not have adequate policies, procedures, and controls in place to ensure compliance with the general procurement standards and suspension and debarment requirements. Effect or Potential Effect Failure to perform procurement procedures in accordance with a written policy that complies with the Uniform Guidance could result in the procurement being disallowed. Failure to timely verify that a vendor is not suspended or debarred could result in entering into a contract with an entity that is barred from performing work for the U.S. government. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context For three procurement samples out of a total of three tested, management did not provide adequate supporting documentation for the procurement transaction. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation We recommend that the Organization establish written procurement policies and procedures to ensure that Organization is in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and that all staff are trained on this policy to ensure compliance and related internal controls over compliance are operating effectively. Views of Responsible Officials Our understanding of the finding is that it pertains to the following sections of 2 CFR 180: § 180.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered transactions? (a) Covered transactions under this part— (1) Do not include any procurement contracts awarded directly by a Federal agency; but (2) Do include some procurement contracts awarded by non Federal participants in nonprocurement covered transactions. (b) Specifically, a contract for goods or services is a covered transaction if any of the following applies: (1) The contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement transaction that is covered under §180.210, and the amount of the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. (2) The contract requires the consent of an official of a Federal agency. In that case, the contract, regardless of the amount, always is a covered transaction, and it does not matter who awarded it. For example, it could be a subcontract awarded by a contractor at a tier below a nonprocurement transaction, as shown in the appendix to this part. § 180.300 What must I do before I enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier? When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. To support compliance with these requirements, MGHPCC controls for federal programs in place in FY23 included the following provision: Criteria for approval of Purchase Orders above $25,000 include a check to ensure that the vendors are not suspended disbarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in a covered transaction as defined in 2CFR 180.220 and 2CFR 180.300. To address the finding noted above, we have added the following documentation requirement: Policy has been updated to require that the check be documented by capturing a copy of the entity information database entry at www.sam.gov as part of the Purchase Order approval process for vendorswho exceed the threshold defined in 2CFR 180.220 and 2CFR 180.300. The entity information database report includes a time stamp, which serves as an indication of when the database entry was checked.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-002 Issue: For the procurement samples tested, Management did not provide adequate supporting documentation for the procurement including ensuring proper suspension and debarment checks were performed. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization establish written procurement policies and procedures to ensure that Organization is in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and that all staff are trained on this policy to ensure compliance and related internal controls over compliance are operating effectively. Action Taken: Current MGHPCC policy states that criteria for approval of Purchase Orders above $25,000 include a check to ensure that the vendors are not suspended disbarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in a covered transaction as defined in 2CFR 180.220 and 2CFR 180.300. Policy has been updated to require that the check be documented by capturing a copy of the entity information database entry at www.sam.gov as part of the Purchase Order approval process for vendors who exceed the threshold defined in 2CFR 180.220 and 2CFR 180.300. The entity information database report includes a time stamp, which serves as an indication of when the database entry was checked. Completion date: The MGHPCC Controls for Federal program document was updated on March 15, 2024, and documentation has been retained for all relevant Purchase Orders subsequent to that date. If the National Science Foundation has questions regarding this plan, please contact John Goodhue by telephone at 413-552-4900 or by email at jtgoodhue@mghpcc.org.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 978888 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
47.070 Computer and Information Science and Engineering $18,828