Finding Text
Finding 2021-007 – Lack of County-Wide Controls Over Major Federal Programs – Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters)
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Oklahoma Department of Emergency Management
FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
ASSISTANCE LISTING: 97.036
FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters)
FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: DR-4438
FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2021
CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Period of Performance; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0-
Condition: Through the process of gaining an understanding of the County’s internal control structure for federal programs, it was noted that county-wide controls regarding Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring have not been designed.
Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the County complies with federal grant requirements.
Effect of Condition: Without an adequate system of county-wide controls, there is greater risk of a breakdown in control activities which could result in noncompliance to federal grant requirements.
Recommendation: OSAI recommends that the County design and implement a system of county-wide procedures to identify and address risks related to compliance with federal award requirements and to ensure that information is communicated effectively. OSAI also recommends that the County design and implement monitoring procedures to assess the quality of performance over time. These procedures should be written policies and procedures and could be included in the County’s policies and procedures handbook.
Management Response:
County Commissioner District 1: We need to become more familiar with federal grant requirements and acknowledge that we understand the requirements to fulfill the grant. After which, we can establish the policies and procedures over federal expenditures.
County Commissioner District 2: We are planning to meet as a group of officers to address county-wide internal controls and we will incorporate federal grants into these meetings.
County Commissioner District 3: This issue will be addressed in the officers’ meetings.
County Clerk: We have implemented new online software to assist with FEMA tracking requirements. We have developed open communication between the Emergency Manager, the Commissioners’ Executive Assistant, the County Treasurer, and the County Clerk to assist with implementation of controls.
Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.303 - Internal Controls states in part:
The non-Federal entity must:
(a)Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Also, the GAO Standards – Section 1 – Fundamental Concepts of Internal Control – OV1.01 states in part:
Definition of Internal Control
Internal control is a process effected by an entity’s oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved.
Additionally, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.04 states in part:
Components, Principles, and Attributes
Control Environment – the foundation for an internal control system. It provides the discipline and structure to help an entity achieve its objectives.
Risk Assessment – Assesses the risks facing the entity as it seeks to achieve its objectives. This assessment provides the basis for developing appropriate risk responses.
Information and Communication – The quality information management and personnel communicate and use to support the internal control system.
Monitoring – Activities management establishes and operates to assess the quality of performance over time and promptly resolve the findings of audits and other reviews.