Finding 392224 (2023-003)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-04-03
Audit: 302441
Organization: Concordia University Irvine (CA)
Auditor: Baker Tilly

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The University failed to properly calculate and return Title IV funds for two students who withdrew, violating federal regulations.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with 34 CFR 668.22 regarding the return of unearned Title IV funds within 45 days of withdrawal.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Review and update policies and procedures for withdrawals and R2T4 calculations to ensure compliance with federal guidelines.

Finding Text

Finding 2023-003: Significant Deficiency – Return of Title IV Funds Program: Federal Direct Student Loans Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Identification Number: P268K233683 Federal Award Year: June 30, 2023 Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22 requires that when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student's withdrawal date in accordance with Federal regulations and return the unearned portion of the grant or loan funds to the Title IV programs as soon as possible but no later than 45 days after the withdrawal date. Condition/Context: In a sample of 14 students that withdrew during the fiscal year, the University did not perform the required return to Title IV calculations for two students who completed less than 60% of the payment period. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Cause: The University incorrectly interpreted the period of enrollment to be the one module and not the entire payment period for the withdrawal exemption for successful completion of 49% or more. Effect: The University incorrectly calculated students as having completed less than 60% and therefore did not perform R2T4 calculations or return unearned loan funds to the Department. Additionally, some R2T4 calculations were incorrect based on the calculation using only the module not the days in the payment period. Questioned costs: Total questioned costs were $3,060 of Direct Student Loan funds. Recommendation: It is recommended that the University review interpretations, policies and procedures in place for withdrawals and R2T4 calculations to ensure that correct dates and institutional charges are being used.

Categories

Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 392223 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 392225 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 392226 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 968665 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 968666 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 968667 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 968668 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $30.69M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $2.49M
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $175,963
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $150,000