Finding 389481 (2023-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-29
Audit: 300451
Organization: Endicott College (MA)
Auditor: Kpmg LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The College failed to report enrollment changes accurately and on time to NSLDS for 13 out of 40 students tested.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with federal regulations requires accurate and timely reporting of enrollment information, affecting loan servicers' decisions and federal interest subsidies.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The College should enhance its enrollment reporting processes to ensure data accuracy and timely submissions to NSLDS.

Finding Text

Finding 2023-002 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program: Student Financial Aid Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Years: 2023 Reference: 2023-002 Criteria Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS. The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSDLSFAP) website. There are two categories of enrollment information, “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition In testing the Campus-Level enrollment reporting data elements as reported to NSLDS, key items to test are: OPEID Number, Enrollment Effective Date, Enrollment Status, and Certification Date. In testing the Program-Level enrollment reporting data elements, key items to test, if applicable, are: OPEID Number, CIP Code, CIP Year, Credential Level, Published Program Length Measurement, Published Program Length, Program Begin Date, Program Enrollment Status, and Program Enrollment Effective Date. Of the 40 students with enrollment changes that we selected for testwork, we identified 13 students whose changes in enrollment status were not timely or accurately transmitted to NSLDS, as follows: • KPMG identified that 9 students had enrollment statuses that did not agree between campus-level and program-level NSLDS data. • KPMG identified that 2 students had Program Enrollment Effective Dates that did not agree the College’s records. • KPMG identified that 2 students had status changes that were reported to NSLDS more than 60 days after the date that the College became aware of the changes. None of the items that were exceptions described above resulted in changes to the amounts awarded or disbursed to students by the College for the current fiscal year. Cause The condition resulted from the College’s internal control processes not operating consistently to ensure that all changes in enrollment information were submitted timely and accurately to NSLDS. Possible Asserted Effect Untimely and inaccurate submission of student enrollment status information affects the determinations that lenders and servicers of students’ loans make related to in-school status, deferments, grace periods, and repayment schedules, as well as the federal government’s payment of interest subsidies. Questioned Costs None. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the College review and enhance its process related to enrollment reporting to ensure that status change key data elements agree to the College’s records and that status changes are reported to NSLDS in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials This issue was caused by a flaw in the current process for reporting enrollment status to NSLDS. Management acknowledges the issues caused by the current processes and the following action has been taken (as of February 2024 when the college became aware of the issue) to improve the situation. Endicott will review and enhance its process related to enrollment reporting. To that end, the Registrar's Office has reviewed all reports being used to gather enrollment reporting information and has created new reports to ensure that both the campus level and program level data are being reported correctly and within appropriate time controls.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Reference 2023-002 Finding: In testing the Campus-Level enrollment reporting data elements as reported to NSLDS, key items to test are: OPEID Number, Enrollment Effective Date, Enrollment Status, and Certification Date. In testing the Program-Level enrollment reporting data elements, key items to test, if applicable, are: OPEID Number, CIP Code, CIP Year, Credential Level, Published Program Length Measurement, Published Program Length, Program Begin Date, Program Enrollment Status, and Program Enrollment Effective Date. Of the 40 students with enrollment changes that we selected for testwork, we identified 13 students whose changes in enrollment status were not timely or accurately transmitted to NSLDS, as follows: • KPMG identified that 9 students had enrollment statuses that did not agree between campus-level and program-level NSLDS data. • KPMG identified that 2 students had Program Enrollment Effective Dates that did not agree the College’s records. • KPMG identified that 2 students had status changes that were reported to NSLDS more than 60 days after the date that the College became aware of the changes. None of the items that were exceptions described above resulted in changes to the amounts awarded or disbursed to students by the College for the current fiscal year. Endicott College Responsible Contact: Karen Loomer, Registrar, Corrective Action Plan: The issues caused by the current processes and the following action has been taken to improve the situation. Endicott will review and enhance its process related to enrollment reporting. To that end, the Registrar’s Office has reviewed all reports being used to gather enrollment reporting information and has created new reports to ensure that both the campus level and program level data are being reported correctly and within appropriate time controls. Anticipated Completion Date: February 2024

Categories

Student Financial Aid Reporting Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 389480 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 965922 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 965923 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $25.29M
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $2.53M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $2.05M
93.264 Nurse Faculty Loan Program (nflp) $889,462
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $374,122
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $195,408
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $161,389
16.752 Economic High-Tech and Cyber Crime Prevention $83,113
45.163 Promotion of the Humanities_professional Development $45,956
16.543 Missing Children's Assistance $28,420