Finding 389384 (2023-005)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-29
Audit: 300370
Organization: Urshan College (MO)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: One student was incorrectly allowed to continue receiving financial aid despite being on suspension for not meeting the completion rate.
  • Impacted Requirements: The College failed to follow the satisfactory academic progress policy, specifically regarding student notifications and completion assessments.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a review process to ensure compliance with eligibility assessments and reporting requirements for financial aid.

Finding Text

2023-005 Eligibility Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P063P218567-2023, P268K228567-2023 Award Periods: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance - Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Regulations (34 CFR 668.34) Satisfactory academic progress. An institution must establish a reasonable satisfactory academic progress policy for determining whether an otherwise eligible student is making satisfactory academic progress in his or her educational program and may receive assistance under the title IV, HEA programs. The Secretary considers the institution's policy to be reasonable if: (1) Provide a policy that, if at the time of each evaluation, the student has not achieved the required GPA, is not successfully completing their program of study at the required pace (if required), or has not completed the program within the maximum time frame, they no longer are eligible for Title IV aid; (2) Provides specific procedures for disbursements to students on financial aid warning status or financial aid probation status; (3) If the institution permits the student to appeal a determination, provides specific procedures how the student may reestablish eligibility to receive Title IV; basis on which a student may file an appeal; and information that the student must submit regarding why they failed satisfactory academic progress and how they have changed that will now allow the student to make satisfactory academic progress at the next evaluation; (4) If the institution does not permit the student to appeal a determination, describes how a student may reestablish their eligibility to receive Title IV assistance; and (5) Provides for notification to the students of their results of an evaluation that impacts their eligibility for Title IV. Condition: Of the sixty (60) students tested for eligibility, one (1) student was on suspension status after the Spring 2022 semester due to not meeting the 67% completion rate and continued to fall below the completion rate in Fall 2022 and Spring 2023 semesters. Student did not receive a letter of suspension because they were meeting the GPA requirement and the Financial Aid office was not assessing completion status. The student's account showed a SAP status of Suspension for the 3 semesters; however, the student did not receive a letter of suspension or submit an appeal to continue to receive Aid. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Of the sixty (60) students tested for eligibility, one (1) student was on suspension status after the Spring 2022 semester due to not meeting the 67% completion rate and continued to fall below the completion rate in Fall 2022 and Spring 2023 semesters. Student did not receive a letter of suspension because they were meeting the GPA requirement and the Financial Aid office was not assessing completion status. The student's account showed a SAP status of Suspension for the 3 semesters; however, the student did not receive a letter of suspension or submit an appeal to continue to receive Aid. Cause: The College did not have the appropriate resources and staffing in place to verify they were in compliance with all requirements. Effect: Failure to properly assess student's SAP status based on the policy may result in students receiving funds they are no longer qualified for. Repeat findings: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the College design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Categories

Student Financial Aid Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Eligibility Reporting Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 389382 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 389383 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 389385 2023-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 389386 2023-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 389387 2023-007
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 389388 2023-007
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 389389 2023-008
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 389390 2023-008
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 965824 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 965825 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 965826 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 965827 2023-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 965828 2023-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 965829 2023-007
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 965830 2023-007
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 965831 2023-008
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 965832 2023-008
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $1.45M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $816,917