Finding 383785 (2023-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-22

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance with federal regulations, specifically related to indirect cost rates exceeding the 10% limit.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with 2 CFR 200.303(a) and 2 CFR 200.414(f) regarding effective internal controls and consistent cost charging.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement stricter billing processes to ensure adherence to the 10% de minimis cost rate and improve communication between accounting and program teams.

Finding Text

Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: DA-202201-00320-2022, DA-251-2022, DA-230-2022 Pass-Through Agency: King County Regional Homelessness Authority Pass-Through Number(s): DA-202201-00320, DA-251, DA-230 Award Period: January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022 Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that a non-federal entity must "Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)". In addition, 2 CFR 200.414(f) states that "...As described in § 200.403, costs must be consistently charged as either indirect or direct costs but may not be double charged or inconsistently charged as both. If chosen, this methodology once elected must be used consistently for all Federal awards until such time as a non-Federal entity chooses to negotiate for a rate, which the non-Federal entity may apply to do at any time". Condition: During testing of indirect costs, 3 of the 11 contracts tested exceeded the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate elected by the organization. Questioned costs: ALN Contract Known Questioned Costs Likely Questioned Costs 21.027 DA-202201-00320 $5,554 None 21.027 DA-251 $22,994 None 21.027 DA-230 $463 None Context: CLA tested the entire population (11 contracts) for indirect costs charged to the major program. Of the contracts tested, 3 were found to be out of compliance with the provisions for 2 CFR 200.303(a) and 2 CFR 200.414(f). Indirect costs exceeding the 10% de minimis cost rate elected by CCS totaled $29,011. Cause: Due to the high volume of client assistance in these programs, there can be several general ledger reclassifications in each month. This is because clients may be eligible for a specific funding source or contract that differs from the original coding. This can lead to multiple general ledgers being sent between the accounting department and the program compliance teams. At times there has been a lack of communication to confirm the general ledger is finalized with indirect at 10%. Program managers will accidentally invoice before the adjustment. Effect: Without adequate documentation and controls in place to ensure costs are reasonable and intended for the program charged, CCS could incorrectly charge expenditures to the federal program, report fraudulent expenditures, or not request appropriate reimbursement that CCS is entitled to under the terms of the grant. Inadequate allocation of indirect costs to federal programs may result in noncompliance with grant regulations, which could result in penalties or repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends that emphasis be placed during the billing process to ensure that no more than the 10% de minimis cost rate is charged each month. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Cash Management HUD Housing Programs Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 383771 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383772 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383773 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383774 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383775 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383776 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383777 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383778 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383779 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383780 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383781 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383782 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383783 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 383784 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 383786 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 383787 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 383788 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 383789 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 383790 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960213 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960214 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960215 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960216 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960217 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960218 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960219 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960220 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960221 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960222 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960223 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960224 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960225 2023-003
    Material Weakness
  • 960226 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960227 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960228 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960229 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960230 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960231 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960232 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
93.498 Provider Relief Fund $1.19M
93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program $336,758
93.045 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part C_nutrition Services $320,591
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services_projects of Regional and National Significance $292,906
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $273,963
64.024 Va Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program $236,651
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $230,402
14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids $218,707
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $200,000
64.033 Va Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program $176,453
93.788 Opioid Str $136,967
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $96,016
94.002 Retired and Senior Volunteer Program $65,455
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $54,666
93.242 Mental Health Research Grants $43,283
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $31,698
93.224 Consolidated Health Centers (community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) $27,170
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $25,426
93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services $23,850
93.914 Hiv Emergency Relief Project Grants $23,456
20.513 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $19,593
93.053 Nutrition Services Incentive Program $12,420
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $6,835
97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program $5,431
10.569 Emergency Food Assistance Program (food Commodities) $1,589
93.044 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part B_grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers $1,458
93.052 National Family Caregiver Support, Title Iii, Part E $244