Finding 38172 (2022-003)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
E
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-06-27

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Authority is not following HUD requirements for tenant eligibility, leading to potential voiding of HAP contracts.
  • Impacted Requirements: Lease agreements and HAP contracts must be signed and submitted within specific timeframes to ensure compliance.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement ongoing quality control, enhance staff training, and review staffing levels to improve compliance oversight.

Finding Text

2022-003 - Eligibility ? Tenant Files Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers ? CFDA Number 14.871 Material Weakness in Internal Control, Material Noncompliance Repeat of 9/30/21 Finding 2021-005 (Originally reported as finding 2020-005 at 09/30/20) Criteria: As a condition of assisted tenancy, the landlord and tenant must execute the lease agreement and tenancy addendum prior to the initial term of the lease, and the public housing authority must execute the HAP contract within 60 days from the beginning of the lease term (24 CFR 982.305). In addition, the tenant must submit to the public housing authority a request for approval of tenancy and a copy of the lease during the term of the voucher (24 CFR 982.302). Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 884 leased vouchers, 25 files were selected for testing in a statistically valid sample. Exceptions were noted as follows: ? 1 error where the lease agreement was not signed by the owner ? 1 error where the file did not contain a signed lease agreement ? 1 error where the file did not contain a signed HAP contract. Also, during our New Admissions testing (11 tested out of 108 new admissions) we noted the following: ? 1 error where the HAP contract was signed but not dated by the Authority. ? 1 error where the lease agreement was not signed by the owner. ? 4 errors where the RFTA was signed but not dated by the landlord and/or by the tenant. Cause: Compliance with all of the HUD requirements was not being carefully followed and the Authority lacked procedures for proper oversight and review of employees performing these compliance procedures. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with the assisted tenancy requirements. The HAP contract is void if the Authority is unable to obtain an executed lease agreement and tenancy addendum prior to the initial term of the lease. Also, the HAP contract is void if an executed HAP contract is not obtained within 60 days from the beginning of the lease term. In addition, the HAP contract is void if the request for approval of tenancy and copy of the lease is submitted after the lease term (including extensions). As such, the tenant would not meet the eligibility requirements to be housed. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Authority acknowledges this finding and will establish more review, oversight and training for the staff responsible for these procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-003 - Eligibility ? Tenant Files Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers ? CFDA Number 14.871 Material Weakness in Internal Control, Material Noncompliance Repeat of 9/30/21 Finding 2021-005 (Originally reported as finding 2020-005 at 09/30/20) Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 884 leased vouchers, 25 files were selected for testing in a statistically valid sample. Exceptions were noted as follows: ? 1 error where the lease agreement was not signed by the owner ? 1 error where the file did not contain a signed lease agreement ? 1 error where the file did not contain a signed HAP contract. Also, during our New Admissions testing (11 tested out of 108 new admissions) we noted the following: ? 1 error where the HAP contract was signed but not dated by the Authority. ? 1 error where the lease agreement was not signed by the owner. ? 4 errors where the RFTA was signed but not dated by the landlord and/or by the tenant. Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load. Action Taken: The Authority has hired an outside CPA firm to conduct quarterly reviews of files and to assist in training staff on HUD compliance requirements. The noted deficiencies in the tested files are being corrected and staff will continue to receive adequate training involving the compliance of all the Department of Housing Urban Development (HUD) requirements.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Eligibility Material Weakness Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 38166 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 38167 2022-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 38168 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 38169 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 38170 2022-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 38171 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 614608 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 614609 2022-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 614610 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 614611 2022-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 614612 2022-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 614613 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 614614 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $6.15M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $1.05M
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $277,056
14.850 Covid-19 Public and Indian Housing $99,415
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $27,693