Finding 38034 (2022-002)

Material Weakness
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-08-14
Audit: 30392
Organization: Franklin County (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The County failed to verify that vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into contracts exceeding $25,000, violating federal compliance requirements.
  • Impacted Requirements: Lack of internal controls led to noncompliance with 2 CFR 200.303 and 31 CFR 19.300, risking future federal funding.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish a robust internal control system with clear policies and procedures for verifying vendor eligibility before contracts are signed.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing the County to claim its total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $4,420,475 as revenue loss to use for government services. As such, all SLFRF program funds to date were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) determined that there are no subawards under this eligible use category, and that recipients' use of revenue loss funds would not give rise to subrecipient relationships given that there is no federal program or purpose to carry out in the case of the revenue loss portion of the award. Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under procurement and non-procurement transactions (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person/entity, or adding a clause or condition to the contract with that person/entity. Due to the Treasury's determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the County in order to review the policies and procedures in place related to suspension and debarment requirements, the County advised that they did not have any policies or procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. There were three vendors with which the County entered into contracts during the audit period, each of which were expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and were paid from SLFRF funds. The first covered transaction in the amount of $488,325 was made to a vendor for repairs to the roof of the County government building. A second covered transaction in the amount of $70,000 was made to a vendor for painting the County courthouse and government building. The third covered transaction in the amount of $44,600 was made to a vendor for engineering and architecture work for the Accessible Entrance Improvements project at the County government building. Upon review of each contract, none of the three included a clause or condition stating that the vendor was not excluded or disqualified. In addition, the County did not check the EPLS or collect a certification from any of the three vendors; therefore, no documentation to verify the County's compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements was provided for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. We also recommended that supporting documentation be retained in order to be presented for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-002 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Karla J. Bauman Contact Phone Number:765-647-4631 Views of Responsible Official: I concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Suspension & Debarment-The Commissioners approved a new process for all contracts being paid with Federal money over $25,000 that must occur before they will approve the contract for said services. The department head must get the certification from the Contractor. The commissioners have also approved the Franklin County Internal Control Manual for Grant Administration which addresses the necessary requirements for the Suspension & Debarment. Any department receiving grants on behalf of Franklin County will be required to certify to the Commissioners that they have read the internal control manual for grant administration and that they understand their responsibilities and will follow all required Federal, State and Local regulations. Completed June 28, 2023.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 614476 2022-002
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $626,469
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $223,572
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $172,464
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $149,897
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $124,628
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $110,000
16.034 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program $38,709
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $38,032
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $31,876
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $18,000
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $16,282
20.703 Interagency Hazardous Materials Public Sector Training and Planning Grants $10,990
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $6,088
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $5,403
16.588 Violence Against Women Formula Grants $5,105